Answer:
Katie is not cheating. From the question, it sounds like Katie's spinner is 1-12. James has two dice so he has two sets of each number 1-6. This means that Katie can roll two numbers greater than six but James can only roll up to six. Using probability, I think there is a 50% chance that Katie's number will be bigger than James every time she spins. A fairer way would be for them both to play with the same dice or spinner.
Step-by-step explanation:
Simply the radical expression
1 I think. Tell me if that is correct
The 1st graph has vertex in (-3, -3) which can be translated into
Horizontal shift left 3
Vertical shift down 3
Other than that, the graph shows y=x^2 so it wasn't compressed or stretched
The 2nd graph has vertex in (0, 0) which mean there is no vertical and horizontal shift. But the graph is facing down and it was slimmer than y=x^2 graph. When x=1, the result is y=3 which was 3 times more than it supposed to be.
The graph must be:
Reflection across x-axis
Vertical stretch of 3
The 3rd graph has vertex in (3, -3) which can be translated into
Horizontal shift right 3
Vertical shift down 3
Same as the 1st graph, the 3rd graph shows y=x^2 so it wasn't compressed or stretched.
