Answer:
Not a proper exercise of Congress' enforcement power. and violated separation of powers intruded on states' rights.
Explanation:
Under the RFRA, the government is prohibited from burdening religion's free exercise. The Court held that while Congress may enact such legislation as the RFRA, in an attempt to prevent the abuse of religious freedoms, it may not determine the manner in which states enforce the substance of its legislative restrictions.
the RFRA overly restricts the states' freedom to enforce legislative restrictions.
"A. a giant snowman" would constitute the adverb phrase in this sentence. In general this phrase comes after the subject noun, but not in all cases.
The logical fallacy that is being used in the passage is B) overgeneralization.
Although there are some narratives written after 1920 that are characterized by their complexity such as William Faulkner's works,<u> not all literature written after that time is difficult to understand</u>. Furthermore, complexity is not a synonym of a lack of elegance or refinement.
There are flaws in reasoning in this passage due to hasty generalization. Overgeneralization occurs when someone unable to consider the whole panorama generalises from inadequate or insufficient evidence and reaches a rushed conclusion about a certain subject. It is overgeneralization what has lead this passage to become an illogical statement.
Your thesis statement is a bit wordy. Omit the phrase "and other problems." Change the wording in the latter half of your thesis, as it makes it sound like you are trying to regulate the consequences, not the thing itself. You should also list the consequences. Here's an example of a thesis statement that would sound better (corrections are in bold):
Advancements in genetic engineering such as designer babies have impacted people's lives by getting rid of genetic diseases<u>;</u> however, these advancements should be regulated because of their many consequences, including [consequences here].
