Answer:
The infant industry argument is an economic rationale for trade protectionism. The core of the argument is that nascent industries often do not have the economies of scale that their older competitors from other countries may have, and thus need to be protected until they can attain similar economies of scale.
"Real Wages" are wages that are adjusted for inflation and rising prices. As prices rise, people are able to buy less and less with their "nominal" (aka un-adjusted) wages.
One example is gas for your car. If you make $1000 a month and gas goes up from $2.50 to $3, your un-adjusted wages stay the same (you still make $1000) but you can't buy as much of other things because your "real" wages have effectively gone down due to the price increase of gas.
Answer:
This took me a long time to figure out , but I'm pretty sure number 1 is
D) Silk and Wool.
And number 2 is C) Northern Nigeria
Explanation: Hope that's right, sorry if not because for number 1 most of them could be the answer, and for number 2, three of them could be the answer.
Answer:
Cognitive dissonance
Explanation:
Cognitive dissonance is a psychological notion when an individual experiences thoughts and emotions that are not consistent (no matter the environment). In this example, it was expected from Fatima to quit her job (since she hated the manager). In spite of that, she continued to work. That caused the cognitive dissonance in her behavior, as she changed her attitude.
Answer:
Therefore government purchases is $300 million
Explanation:
In this case, GDP is the sum of consumption, investment, and government purchases. To calculate the value of consumption we use the formula:
CC + II + GG = Y
GG = Y - CC - II
Where:
government purchases = GG
taxes minus transfer payments (TT) = $260 million
consumption (CC) = $300 million
investment (II) = $300 million
Y = country GDP = $800 million
GG = Y - CC - II
Substituting:
GG = $800 million - $300 milllion - $300 million
GG = $200 million
Therefore government purchases is $300 million
