Based on the question given this is the answer:
The punishment was justified because it was simple and
straight to the point for the baby’s name to be mention early. It reflected the
characters actions and if there was any punishment that was even crueler that
wouldn’t be very fair.
The Crucible is set in a theocratic society, in which the church and the state are one, and the religion is a strict, austere form of Protestantism known as Puritanism. Because of the theocratic nature of the society, moral laws and state laws are one and the same: sin and the status of an individual’s soul are matters of public concern. There is no room for deviation from social norms, since any individual whose private life doesn’t conform to the established moral laws represents a threat not only to the public good but also to the rule of God and true religion. In Salem, everything and everyone belongs to either God or the devil; dissent is not merely unlawful, it is associated with satanic activity. This dichotomy functions as the underlying logic behind the witch trials. As Danforth says in Act III, “a person is either with this court or he must be counted against it.” The witch trials are the ultimate expression of intolerance (and hanging witches is the ultimate means of restoring the community’s purity); the trials brand all social deviants with the taint of devil-worship and thus necessitate their elimination from the community.
Let me know if this helps
Answer:
The point the author is trying to make in the article is:
There are many alternatives that can be used to make straws instead of plastic.
Explanation:
Following the need to reduce the environmental footprint of plastic for household items, it is necessary that alternative materials should replace plastic. In the article, the author narrates the huge plastic pollution in recent years, and argues that "cheap and disposable plastic straws should be replaced with reusable stainless steel, glass, or biodegradable paper alternatives."