Answer:
B. $1,639
Explanation:
To do arbitraje we will ask at Bank A for $0.305
and then bid in Bank B at $0.306
As the transactions has no cost we are doing a profit by using the exchange as they allowed. Doing this procedure will at some point eliminate the difference in exchange rate for these bank as the purchase will rise the ask rate for Bank A and the sale will decrease the bid rate.
Total: 501639,3442622951
The profit will be for: 501,639.34 - 500,000 = 1,639.34
Answer:
Shoe leather costs
Explanation:
(A) Shoe leather costs
(B) Inflation can be defined as the persistent rise in the prices of goods and services. Shoe leather costs can be defined as the costs of time and effort that are encountered by individuals while trying to prevent the effect of inflation. It describes the costs incurred by individuals that visits the bank often inorder to withdraw money needed to purchase goods and services during the time of inflation.
Shoe leather cost arises during the period of high inflation, individuals do not hold large amount of cash because there will be a reduction in the value of the money.
Answer:
Option D
Explanation:
In simple words, the problem depicted in the given scenario is an example of low knowledge of the target audience. In the given case, the company did everything correct with respect to their procedures, like they made a question are in the local language and distributed to the target audience and collected the survey efficiently.
However while doing the procedure, they were unaware of the fact that their target audience was not literate enough. Hence we can conclude that the correct answer is D.
It diversify the workload and allows people to make more connections and all while having multiple view on one problem to help in finding or solving a problem.
Answer:
- <em>As explained below, given that the score of the person is among the 0.03125 fraction of the best applicants, </em><u><em>he can count on getting one of the jobs.</em></u>
<em></em>
Explanation:
The hint is to use <em>Chebyshev’s Theorem.</em>
Chebyshev’s Theorem applies to any data set, even if it is not bell-shaped.
Chebyshev’s Theorem states that at least 1−1/k² of the data lie within k standard deviations of the mean.
For this sample you have:
- mean: 60
- standard deviation: 6
- score: 84
The number of standard deviations that 84 is from the mean is:
- k = (score - mean) / standar deviation
- k = (84 - 60) / 6 = 24 / 6 = 4
Thus, the score of the person is 4 standard deviations above the mean.
How good is that?
Chebyshev’s Theorem states that at least 1−1/k² of the data lie within k standard deviations of the mean. For k = 4, that is:
- 1 - 1/4² = 1 - 1/16 = 0.9375
- That means that half of 1 - 0.9375 are above k = 4: 0.03125
- Then, 1 - 0.03125 are below k = 4: 0.96875
Since there are 70 positions and 1,000 aplicants, 70/1,000 = 0.07. The compnay should select the best 0.07 of the applicants.
Given that the score of the person is among the 0.03125 upper fraction of the applicants, this person can count of geting one of the jobs.
