Answer:
What follows is a bill of indictment. Several of these items end up in the Bill of Rights. Others are addressed by the form of the government established—first by the Articles of Confederation, and ultimately by the Constitution.
The assumption of natural rights expressed in the Declaration of Independence can be summed up by the following proposition: “First comes rights, then comes government.” According to this view: (1) the rights of individuals do not originate with any government, but preexist its formation; (2) the protection of these rights is the first duty of government; and (3) even after government is formed, these rights provide a standard by which its performance is measured and, in extreme cases, its systemic failure to protect rights—or its systematic violation of rights—can justify its alteration or abolition; (4) at least some of these rights are so fundamental that they are “inalienable,” meaning they are so intimately connected to one’s nature as a human being that they cannot be transferred to another even if one consents to do so. This is powerful stuff.
At the Founding, these ideas were considered so true as to be self-evident. However, today the idea of natural rights is obscure and controversial. Oftentimes, when the idea comes up, it is deemed to be archaic. Moreover, the discussion by many of natural rights, as reflected in the Declaration’s claim that such rights “are endowed by their Creator,” leads many to characterize natural rights as religiously based rather than secular. As I explain in The Structure of Liberty: Justice and the Rule of Law, I believe his is a mistake.
Mark Brainliest
The temp at the surface of the sun is about 10,000 Fahrenheit.
I believe the answer is: morality
The purpose of morality is to act as some sort of guidance to perform correct behavior that all 'rational' persons should do within a social group. Morality does not necessarily regulated by law, but violating it would definitely make a member of a social group the be negatively perceived by other members.
The correct answer is Each of the above actions is consistent with social responsibility and none are necessarily inconsistent with stockholder wealth maximization.
Social responsibility is when companies voluntarily adopt attitudes, behaviors and actions that promote the well-being of their internal and external audiences. It is a voluntary practice as it should not be confused exclusively by compulsory actions imposed by the government or by any external incentives (such as taxes, for example). The concept, in this view, involves the benefit of the community, whether it is related to the internal public (employees, shareholders, etc.) or external actors (community, partners, environment, etc.).
Over time, this conception has given rise to some variations or nuances. Thus, new concepts - often complementary, distinct or redundant - are used to define social responsibility, including Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Social Responsibility.
Answer:
D. plant growth increases in the spring
Explanation:
You have to observe the plant growth throughout the year to collect your information/findings. A. Earthquakes are bad, is something thats just common sense, even little primary school kids can tell you, "earthquakes are bad." B. Dogs like bones, is not observation, you will see your little friend dig up a whole and find a bone, and bury it again, many of us had, like the earthquakes, many know and there is no need for observation. C. Sunsets are pretty, this is also not observation because there are some people in this world that don't like sunsets, so 'sunsets are pretty' is an opinion.
<u>Brainliest please?</u>
