Its could be:
a red and white sign like a "STOP" sign to tell you a direction to follow
or a "WRONG WAY" sign if you're going the wrong way
a regulatory sign tells you directions that you have to follow
Answer:
A lobbyist is a professional whose job is to make contacts with influential people in Washington (or whatever government) and make a case on behalf of a client. They're regulated under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995. If you're spending most of your time chatting with Congressmen, then you need to file forms saying who you're talking to and on whose behalf. These forms are filed with the clerks in the House and the Senate.
While a Political Action Committee (PAC) is a group of people with some kind of interest. They collect money and spend it to promote that interest. They have to file forms, with the Federal Election Commission rather than with the legislative branch, though unlike the lobbyists they have ways to not disclose who's giving them money. They can hold public meetings, buy TV advertising, donate money to causes, give money to candidates (a small amount- about $5k to candidates and $15k to parties), and hire lobbyists.
Generally, when a PAC hires a lobbyist, the lobbyist is the one to go to the legislator and make the case on behalf of the PAC. They may also bring the PAC's own team to make the presentation, but they need to be very careful about crossing the (byzantine) set of rules trying to keep the ethical lines clear-ish. Conceivably, they could have lobbyists on staff, but it exposes the entire organization to levels of disclosure that they'd generally rather not have. Thus, the usual plan is for a PAC to hire an established lobbying firm, who is already registered and prepared to handle the paperwork.
Explanation:
Hope this helped :)
Answer:
It is D: Negotiation is a criminal matter and mediation is a civil matter.
Answer:
Make no recommendations and let the sellers decide on their own. Tell the sellers exactly how she feels and why she thinks the offer is not a good one.
Answer:
Por fuera del poder judicial, crearía un organismo colegiado formado igualitariamente por miembros pertenecientes a los distintos partidos políticos que se hubieran presentado en las elecciones presidenciales: por ejemplo, si hubiesen participado 5 partidos, cada uno tendría una participación del 20% en dicho organismo.
Este organismo tendría la función de evaluar las políticas del gobierno y, a través de mayorías simples, emitir dictámenes evaluatorios periódicos respecto del poder ejecutivo, pudiendo, en caso de creerlo conveniente, remitir causas al poder judicial para evaluar las políticas llevadas a cabo y declararlas nulas.
