All categories

2 years ago

What were the two methods for proposing an amendment to the Constitution?

Law

2 answers:

velikii [3]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

by the Congress, through a joint resolution passed by a two-thirds vote, or by a convention called by Congress in response to applications from two-thirds of the state legislatures

WARRIOR [948]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Article V of the Constitution provides two ways to propose amendments to the document. Amendments may be proposed either by the Congress, through a joint resolution passed by a two-thirds vote, or by a convention called by Congress in response to applications from two-thirds of the state legislatures.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

What prevents one branch from becoming to powerfull

Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

Answer:

the Checks and Balances system.

Explanation:

this should be right

7 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

On Tuesday morning, Mac parked his car in the same parking lot that he used each day. He paid the attendant, locked his car, and

irina1246 [14]

Answer:

because the parking lot owner is the one responsible if any car is stolen

8 0

2 years ago

While on a cruise, DePrince inquired about the price of a 20-carat diamond in the ship's gift shop. After confirming with the cr

ivanzaharov [21]

Answer:

1. It made a Unilateral mistake

2. It cannot be voided by the cruise line

Explanation:

This cruise line has made a Unilateral mistake in this scenario.

In terms of the law, this cruise line does not have the power to void the transaction on its own accord in the normal course of business. but it has the right to plea in a law court that it did this business transaction sale based on non availability of complete price quote and also that there was a unilateral mistake of facts. It will also have to make a case that the sale was caused by the buyer who tried to benefit from the mistake through misrepresentation and omissions.

The court would then decide on the case at it own discretion.

8 0

2 years ago

Looking at the response vehicles (pictured above), explain two options you have in order to abide by the Move Over law.

iren2701 [21]

Attach a photo so we can help you out

3 0

2 years ago

which criteria must a law meet in order to pass the government’s strict scrutiny test to reasonably discriminate? select all tha

KatRina [158]

The criteria that law must meet in order to pass the government’s strict scrutiny test to reasonably discriminate includes"

It must further a compelling government interest
It must use the least restrictive means to achieve its purpose.

<h3>What is a strict scrutiny test?</h3>

In law, a strict scrutiny refers to the highest standard of review which a court will use to evaluate the constitutionality of governmental discrimination. In order for a law to pass strict scrutiny, the legislature must have passed the law to further a "compelling governmental interest" and must have narrowly tailored the law to achieve that interest.

This standard is the highest and most of the stringent standard of judicial review and is part of the levels of judicial scrutiny that courts use to determine whether a constitutional right or principle should give way to the government's interest against observance of the principle. However, the lesser standards are rational basis review and exacting or intermediate scrutiny and these standards are applied to statutes and government action at all levels of government within the United States.