1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alexdok [17]
2 years ago
10

Do you think dictators and fascist regimes would have risen to power if Europe hadn’t been so economically depressed after World

War I? Explain your answer.
History
1 answer:
klasskru [66]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

World War II would at least would have been averted in the European Sector.

Explanation:

When we look at the European theatre, we typically look towards Germany as being the aggressor state. Why did Germany fall into disarray and appeared as a militaristic totalitarian regime?

The first event we must take a look at is the "Treaty of Versailles". The Treaty of Versailles forced Germany to pay billions of marks in compensation to many of the victorious Allied states, as well as relinquish their territories and colonies. This forced Germany to print trillions of marks in hopes of paying the debt, which caused the mark to lose face value. With large amounts of money in circulation, and nothing to hold the face value of the mark afloat, the money became essentially worthless. Coupled with the Great Depression, many German families struggled to even obtain the bare minimum to survive.

The failure of the democratic German government to be able to solve this problem saw to the people looking for other leaders, and leaders such as Hitler and the Nazi party became popular as they promised a steady economy, as well as the retake of lost territories and the strength of the Reichsmark. With such, the Nazi Party rose in prominence, and became the dominant government, bringing with it it's ulterior motive of creating a master race, and the rest is history.

The same can be said of Japan. Japan felt that it was essentially handed the short end of the stick, as it was also in the victorious Allied side, and was not given much territory for their role. This, coupled with the Great Depression, saw the rise of a militaristic government with the Emperor as a puppet head of the state, and their territorial expansion for natural resources as well as land. If there was no Great Depression, the US could of continued to prop Japan up with funding deals and loans. Without such, Japan became extremely militaristic and rampaged across the Pacific in hopes of obtaining what they could not, through war or their own territories.

~

You might be interested in
When Jackson vetoed the bill passed by Congress he exercised which principle of government?
Varvara68 [4.7K]

Answer:

not really sure...probably the principles of separation of powers?

5 0
3 years ago
What part is temple in
Mamont248 [21]

Answer:

The temple is a juncture where four skull bones fuse together: the frontal, parietal, temporal, and sphenoid. It is located on the side of the head behind the eye between the forehead and the ear. The temporal muscle covers this area and is used during mastication.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which characteristic is an attribute of Saudi Arabian culture?
steposvetlana [31]

Answer:

Most people worship Buddhism

7 0
2 years ago
The system by which residents of Indian villages remained legally free and entitled to wages, but were still required to perform
koban [17]

Answer:

Repartimiento system, is the right answer.

Explanation:

A system of forced labor imposed on the natives of Spanish America and the Philippines is known as the Repartimiento system.

In some form, it was just similar to the tribute-labor system of the Inca Empire or the  Ancien Régime France.

It was a system in which the local population was required to give their labor for the colonial leaders in mines, workshops or farms without pay for some days in a year.

4 0
3 years ago
What happens in a war of attrition
aleksandr82 [10.1K]

Answer:

The International Encyclopedia of the First World War defines attrition warfare as “the sustained process of wearing down an opponent so as to force their physical collapse through continuous losses in personnel, equipment and supplies or [wearing] them down to such an extent that their will to fight collapses.”

Explanation:

don't forget to brainllest:)

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did Congress pass the Lend-Lease Act in 1941?
    15·1 answer
  • British troops fired on a crowd of colonist in boston because
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement about Benjamin Banneker is not true? A. He was the son of a former slave. B. He helped survey the nation's capit
    9·2 answers
  • Why did fear of communism sweep the nation in the late 1940s and 1950s?
    14·1 answer
  • Think about how membership in the House and Senate are different. What are the advantages and disadvantages to membership in bot
    12·1 answer
  • Compare the lifestyle of hunter gatherers with those of settlers in early agriculture communities
    10·1 answer
  • Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition He invaded Mexico and defeated the Aztecs. Hispaniola Atahual
    7·2 answers
  • How did common law come to be practiced as the accepted "norm​
    12·1 answer
  • What was unusual about the king of england, kaiser of germany, and tsar of russia?.
    13·1 answer
  • Help I will give brainlest
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!