Answer:
Statement that best explains the difference in viewpoint in the Greenberg interview from that in the informational text on Thurgood Marshall is Option D: The Greenberg interview provides an insider's view of the Brown vs. Board of Education case; the perspective of the informational article is more distant.
Explanation:
Brown v. Board of Education case was a decision which set benchmark in Supreme Court of U.S. It ruled that the state laws which establish racial discrimination in public schools are unconstitutional.
Thurgood Marshall was an American lawyer in the Supreme Court of the United States. Other given option are incorrect. Greenberg gave personal knowledge of Thurgood Marshall and about the case but the informational article was only based on research.
Greenberg interview gave important details while article was based only on research.
Answer:
A simple sentence is also called an independent clause.
I hope this helped :)
True. The ambiguity is interpreted against the drafting party
Answer:
If the book is Espereza Rising by Pam Muñoz Ryan, the girl wants Espereza to show her the doll her father gave her.
Explanation:
It's in the book.
I think to use logical reasoning.
