To ignore the comment directed to you
<span>Yes the United States federal government
should reduce the progressive income tax rates in favor of an introduction of a
regressive national sales tax. Hence, since U.S progressive income tax means
income redistribution that most taxes are used to fund social welfare programs
however only a small portion of government spending is devoted to welfare
payments. Example of this progressive taxes reduction is the sales tax. Moreover,
If the two individuals buy the same amount of goods or services, the sales tax
constitute a higher percentage of the lower-earning individual’s wages and a lower
percentage of the higher-earning individual’s wages. </span>
Copying my answer from this question from another student who asked the same one:
Social Darwinism is the belief that people and business are subject to the same laws of nature and natural selection. This has been used by business leaders, both in the Gilded Age and today, to create a belief that the strongest businesses are the ones that survive because they survive the competitive process of natural selection.
So, massive oil companies and railroad companies (and tech companies and banks today) used social darwinism to explain their rise to almost monopoly status as a "natural" thing that was accomplished merely using the laws of nature.
I can give some ideas. Imagine that you wore a pair of blue jeans to school and your teacher made you pay them 3 bucks because you wore jeans that day. That not fair. So it’s basically the same thing with taxes. Another scenario is say you had a vote in class and everyone wanted to do a fun project but the teacher said “Seems like everyone wants to take notes!” That how Great Britain treated America. Just list how u fair that is and think about it In these cases. It’s the same thing.
