Answer:
Answer:
- The rhetorical positions and contrasts are as follows:
- Emotions vs cognition
- Emotional as rational vs irrational
- Emotions as cognitive grounded or cognitive consequential.
- Event-driven vs dis-positional
- Dis-positional vs temporary states
- Emotional behavior as controllable actions or passive reactions
- Spontaneous vs externally caused
- Natural vs moral
- Internal state vs external behavior
- Private vs public behavior
- Honest vs faked behavior
Comparison and contrast are the two terms that has been used to analyse two or more things by using the analytical thinking.
Answer:
b) subjects agree to participate in a study after receiving complete information about the nature and purpose of the study.
Explanation:
In research, the term informed consent refers to the process in which researchers get a voluntary agreement from participants of the study where they state they are willing to participate on it.
This consent involves informing the subjects about their rights, the procedures they will undergone to, the purpose of the study and the risks and benefits they might have. However, in this consent the researchers <u>do not disclose the hypothesis of the study because this might put in risk the results of the study </u>(since participants might change their behavior due to this).
Therefore, the correct answer is that informed consent means that b) subjects agree to participate in a study after receiving complete information about the nature and purpose of the study.
Answer:
The stock market crashed.
Explanation:
The stock market crashed and so people got upset because then their money lowered and then people began ending lives because of the Great Depression.
Answer:
b. judicial activism, because it was based on a constitutional right to privacy that is not found in the actual words of the Constitution.
Explanation:
Judicial activism is a concept developed in 1947 by an American historian called Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. it simply talks about a description of a judicial decision made in a law court, in which the judge is more concerned with deciding constitutional issues and invalidating executive or legislative actions.
A clear example of this is the Roe v. Wade case where the supreme court of the United States of America rightly established on January 22, 1973, a woman’s legal right to have an abortion.
