The franchise relationship is defined by the contract between the franchisor and the franchisee. The franchise contract specifies the terms and conditions of the franchise and spells out the rights and duties of the franchisor and the franchisee.
If either party fails to perform its contractual duties, that party may be subject to a lawsuit for breach of contract. If a fran-chisee is induced to enter into a franchise contract by the franchisor's fraudulent misrepresentation, the franchisor may be liable for damages. Generally, statutes and the case law governing franchising tend to emphasize the importance of good faith and fair dealing in franchise relationships.
Answer:
The Franchise Contract
Explanation:
The franchise contract is contract between the franchisor and the franchisee. It defines the terms and conditions as well as the rights and duties of both parties in the contract. Each party will be liable for damages if there is a breach of contract stemming from breach of duty or rights or terms of the contract. There are statutes and laws that govern franchising in most countries ensuring fair franchise contractual relationships
States generally try to build up reserves in good times so they’re prepared for recessions and other fiscal emergencies and can avoid cutting public services during these difficult times. The amount of reserves a state needs depends on the potential volatility of its revenues and economy; states dependent on oil and other natural resources are particularly vulnerable because prices for these resources tend to fluctuate a lot. Sales taxes, which make up a third of state revenues, are rapidly collapsing as restaurants and stores across the country close their doors and lay off their workers. Income taxes, which make up another third of state revenues, also will decline sharply as mass layoffs rapidly push down people’s income and therefore their income taxes. Plus, the steep drop in the stock market means that wealthy people will soon begin reporting massive capital losses on their quarterly tax returns, further reducing state revenue.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I think that what happened to the lost colonists was the following.
First, I have to say that we are talking about the lost colony of Roanoke, North Carolina, in colonial American times.
In 1587, the first group of English explorers or settlers arrived in the North American territory. More specifically, at the Island of Roanoke, modern-day North Carolina. Those 115 English colonists named John White as their governor. There, White had to return to England to get more food and supplies. The thing was that he couldn't immediately get back to Roanoke because the British war against Spain demanded the use of all the ships.
Three years later, in 1590, White finally returned to Roanoke but sadly, nobody was there. They literally "disappeared." That is still a mystery today.
I think the colonists tried to survive the harsh environment and different climate conditions and had to move to find food. They could intermingle with some Native American Indians: Some friendly, that accepted to help them. Some not, and probably they killed the colonists.
Illegal mining activities were identified as the cause of environmental problems such as water pollution, deforestation, poor soil fertility and limited access to land for agriculture productivity.
Answer:
FALSE
Explanation:
A group in Japan was like lords in Europe? - Daimyos
PLZ MARK BRAINILIST
