Thus, when white<span> light passes from air into a glass prism, </span>violet<span> bends the most and</span>red<span> bends the least. The other colors are bent by an amount between </span>violet<span> and </span>red<span>. When the light exits the prism, the light is separated into the colors in the visible spectrum.</span>
The answer to your question would be that the definition that best identifies and explains the function of the word "tying" as it is used in this sentence is the following one: In the selected sentence, the word "tying" is a verbal that functions as an adverb.
A verbal is a word formed from a verb but functioning as a different part of speech. "Tying his shoe" is a participle phrase. In fact, it is present participle phrase, as it is created from the form of a verb used with the verb to be as an auxiliary verb (progressive tense). Removing the auxiliary verb and using the -ing form of the main verb produces a present participle. In this case the participle is functioning as an adverb because it is telling something about the manner in which Garrett prevented an embarrassing fall. He did this tying his shoe. You can tell this by asking the following question: How did Garrett prevent the embarrassing fall? Tying his shoe.
- Cupid is the Roman god of love. He is usually shown as a young boy with wings and a bow and arrow.
- A cupid is a picture or statue of a pretty little boy with wings, often holding a bow and arrow.
<h3>Hope it's Helps~</h3>
Complete the sentences. Use the passive voice. Omit the agent where necessary.
Kindly view the attached image to this answer.
Answer:
Question 5: a. circular reasoning
Both statements fail to prove themselves valid. They rephrase the wording from earlier in the claim.
Question 6: Either-or
The first claim assumes the only way to be a bad doctor is to get your medical degree overseas. It implies that you are either a skilled doctor or one who was educated overseas. In reality, there are more options. The second claim provides two options: a career that benefits humanity or one that makes them enough money. This is a fallacy because a career can be both rather than solely one or the other.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/15911568#readmore
Explanation:
