Answer:
$1,102,820
Explanation:
The computation of the net present value is shown below:
= Present value of yearly cash inflows - initial investment
where,
Present value of yearly cash inflows is
= Annual year cash inflows × PVIFA factor
= $300,000 × 2.9906
= $897,180
And, the initial investment is
= $1,500,000 + $500,000
= $2,000,000
So the net present value is
= $897,180 - $2,000,000
= $1,102,820
A company in monopolistic opposition produces an allocatively green output degree even as a company in best opposition produces a productively green output degree.
The long-run equilibrium answer in monopolistic opposition usually produces 0 monetary income at a factor to the left of the minimal of the common overall value curve. The life of excessive limitations to access prevents corporations from coming into the marketplace even withinside the long run.
Therefore, it's far viable for the monopolist to keep away from opposition and hold making tremendous monetary income withinside the long run. One feature of a monopolist is that it's far a income maximizer. Since there's no opposition in a monopolistic marketplace, a monopolist can manage the charge and the amount demanded. The degree of output that maximizes a monopoly's income is calculated through equating its marginal value to its marginal revenue.
Learn more about company in monopolistic here:
brainly.com/question/25717627
#SPJ4
Answer: -($0.5025) million
Explanation:
As depreciation is expected to increase this year by $0.670 million.
Therefore,
Expenses will increase and will result in decrease in income before tax by $0.670 million.
Additional tax saving on increase in depreciation = $0.67 × 25%
= $0.1675 million
Hence,
Total change in net income = -($0.67) + $0.1675
= -($0.5025) million
Answer:
Choose the best and worst answer to the following question:
Suppose your supervisor returns from vacation and notices that the work area looks terrible. You also had the last two days off. He's angry and criticizes you for being careless and sloppy. This wasn't your fault.
What would you do?
Best answer: Let the coworkers responsible know that you had to take the heat.
worst answer: Tell him it wasn't your fault and not to criticize you unjustly.
Explanation:
Answer: The internal auditor discovered it when performing a routine audit of expense reimbursements
Explanation:
Marcus Lane, was a geologist who travelled all over North America and South America and this results in several expense reimbursements. Lane engaged in fraudulent activity by double booking his air travel.
He used cheaper ticket for the actual flight and more expensive ticket was returned for credit. But, he submitted the expensive ticket for reimbursement.
The fraud was discovered by the internal auditor while doing a routine audit of expense reimbursements. He was terminated and he agreed to pay the money back.
