Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

13

Walter builds birdhouses. He spends $5 on the materials for each birdhouse. He can build one in 30 minutes. He is semi-retired b

ut earns $8 per hour at the local hardware store. He can sell a birdhouse for $20 each. Refer to Scenario 13-11. The implicit cost for one birdhouse is:

1 answer:

Leokris [45]3 years ago

6 0

Answer: $4

Explanation: Implicit cost or sometimes referred to as the opportunity coast is the part of economic cost of a project. It can be defined as the loss of profit someone faces when choosing one alternative over other.

So implicit cost of Walter is $4 ($8 * 1/2HOUR), that is, the amount he could have earned if he were not building a birdhouse.

You might be interested in

financial calculator Bruno's Lunch Counter is expanding and expects operating cash flows of $23,900 a year for 5 years as a resu

Ann [662]

Answer:

NPV = 138,347.55

Explanation:

<em>Net Present Value (NPV) : This is one of the techniques available to evaluate the feasibility of an investment project. The NPV of a project is the difference between the present value of the cash inflows and the cash outflows of the project.</em>

We sahall compute theNPV of this project by discounting the appropriate cash flows as follows:

<em>Prevent Value of operating cash flow</em>

PV =A× (1- (1+r)^(-n))/r

A- 23,900, r - 12%, n- 5

PV = $23,900 × (1- (1.12)^(-5))/0.05

=206,769.963

<em>PV of Working Capital recouped</em>

PV = 5600× 1.12^(-5)

= 3,177.59

NPV = initial cost + working capital + Present Value of working capital recouped + PV of operating cash inflow

NPV = (66,000) + (5600) + 3,177.59 + 206,769.96

NPV = 138,347.55

5 0

3 years ago

The marginal product of an input is the addition to total output due to the addition of the last unit of an input, holding all o

Harman [31]

Answer:

is the addition to total output due to the addition of the last unit of an input, holding all other inputs constant.

Explanation:

The marginal product of an input is the change in total output as a result of the change in output by 1 unit

For example, the table below is the total product of labour

amount of labour output

1 10

2 20

3 40

the marginal product of the 3rd worker = (40 - 20) / (3 - 2) = 20

marginal product of the second worker = (20 - 10) / (2 -1 ) = 10

Average output = total output / labour

6 0

3 years ago

Pluto Inc. is computer technology corporation that has been manufacturing laptops for the last five years. Recently, in the face

Delicious77 [7]

Answer:

diversification

Explanation:

According to my research on ,different financial strategies I can say that based on the information provided within the question this is an example of diversification. This is the process of a business separating or varying it's range of products in their operations in order to reduce their risks in a certain market.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.

3 0

3 years ago

The two main purposes of a business plan are: a. to provide a document to keep employees focused and to seek outside funding. b.

Free_Kalibri [48]

Answer: Option A

Explanation: In simple words, business plan refers to an outline of framework that guides an organisation regarding its operations in future.

Business plan helps the organisation and its employees to set the chain of activities they need to perform for achieving their goals. Business plans also helps to determine the amount of capital needed to finance the projects that further helps the organisation to seek outside funding.

Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct option is A.

8 0

3 years ago

Instructions: Please make sure that you show all your work when solving the problems. Feel free to make any assumptions whenever

My name is Ann [436]

Answer:

Explanation:

From the given information:

The current price = $\dfrac{Dividend(D_o) \times (1+ Growth \ rate) }{\text{Cost of capital -Growth rate}}$

$15 = \dfrac{0.50 \times (1+ Growth rate)}{8\%-Growth rate}$

$15 \times (8 -Growth \ rate) = 0.50 +(0.50 \times growth \ rate)$

$1.20 - (15 \times Growth \ rate) = 0.50 + (0.50 \times growth \ rate)$

$0.70 = (15 \times growth \ rate) \\ \\ Growth \ rate = \dfrac{0.70}{15.50} \\ \\ Growth \ rate = 0.04516 \\ \\ Growth \ rate \simeq 4.52\% \\ \\$

2. The value of the stock

Calculate the earnings at the end of 5 years:

$Earnings (E_o) \times Dividend \ payout \ ratio = Dividend (D_o) \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) \times 35\% = \$0.50 \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) =\dfrac{\$0.50}{35\%} \\ \\ = \$1.42857$

$Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = Earnings (E_o) \times (1 + Growth \ rate)^{no \ of \ years} \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = \$1.42857 \times (1 + 12\%)^5 \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = \$2.51763$

Terminal value year 5 = $\dfrac{Earnings (E_5) \times (1+ Growth \ rate)}{Interest \ rate - Growth \ rate}$

$=\dfrac{\$2.51763\times (1+0.04516)}{8\%-0.04516}$

=$75.526

Discount all potential future cash flows as follows to determine the stock's value:

$\text{Value of stock today} =\bigg( \sum \limits ^{\text{no of years}}_{year =1} \dfrac{Dividend (D_o) \times 1 +Growth rate ) ^{\text{no of years}}}{(1+ interest rate )^{no\ of\ years} }$

$+ \dfrac{Terminal\ Value }{(1+interest \ rate )^{no \ of \ years}} \Bigg)$

$\implies \bigg(\dfrac{\$0.50\times (1 + 12\%)^1) }{(1+ 8\%)^{1} }+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^2 }{(1+8\% )^{2}}+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^3 }{(1+8\% )^{3}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^4 }{(1+8\% )^{4}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^5 }{(1+8\% )^{5}} + \dfrac{\$75.526}{(1+8\% )^{5}} \bigg )$

$\implies \bigg(\dfrac{\$0.5600}{1.0800}+\dfrac{\$0.62720}{1.16640}+\dfrac{\$0.70246}{1.2597}+\dfrac{\$0.78676}{1.3605}+\dfrac{\$0.88117}{1.4693}+ \dfrac{\$75.526}{1.4693} \bigg)$

=$ 54.1945

As a result, the analysts value the stock at $54.20, which is below their own estimates.

3. The value of the stock

Calculate the earnings at the end of 5 years:

$Earnings (E_o) \times Dividend payout ratio = Dividend (D_o) \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) \times 35\% = \$0.50 \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) =\dfrac{\$0.50}{35\%}\\ \\ = \$1.42857$

$Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = Earnings (E_o) \times (1 + Growth \ rate)^{no \ of \ years} \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = \$1.42857 \times (1 + 12\%)^5 \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = \$2.51763 \\ \\$

Terminal value year 5 = $\dfrac{Earnings (E_5) \times (1+ Growth \ rate)\times dividend \ payout \ ratio}{Interest \ rate - Growth \ rate}$

$=\dfrac{\$2.51763\times (1+ 7 \%) \times 20\%}{8\%-7\%}$

=$53.8773

Discount all potential cash flows as follows to determine the stock's value:

$\text{Value of stock today} =\bigg( \sum \limits ^{\text{no of years}}_{year =1} \dfrac{Dividend (D_o) \times 1 + Growth rate ) ^{\text{no of years}}}{(1+ interest rate )^{no \ of\ years} }+ \dfrac{Terminal \ Value }{(1+interest \ rate )^{no \ of \ years }} \bigg)$

$\implies \bigg( \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1 + 12\%)^1) }{(1+ 8\%)^{1} }+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^2 }{(1+8\% )^{2}}+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^3 }{(1+8\% )^{3}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^4 }{(1+8\% )^{4}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^5 }{(1+8\% )^{5}} + \dfrac{\$53.8773}{(1+8\% )^{5}} \bigg)$

$\implies \bigg (\dfrac{\$0.5600}{1.0800}+\dfrac{\$0.62720}{1.16640}+\dfrac{\$0.70246}{1.2597}+\dfrac{\$0.78676}{1.3605}+\dfrac{\$0.88117}{1.4693}+ \dfrac{\$53.8773}{1.4693} \bigg)$

=$39.460

As a result, the price is $39.460, and the other strategy would raise the value of the shareholders. Not this one, since paying a 100% dividend would result in a price of $54.20, which is higher than the current price.

Notice that the third question depicts the situation after 5 years, but the final decision will be the same since we are discounting in current terms. If compounding is used, the future value over 5 years is just the same as the first choice, which is the better option.

The presumption in the second portion is that after 5 years, the steady growth rate would be the same as measured in the first part (1).

8 0

3 years ago