It's definitely not in a theocracy: those usually favour the majorities.
Also migrant labors don't specifically favour minorities.
Now, between democracies and command economies the choice is very hard, as it depends more on the specific country. So for example in many places the role of the minorities rose in command economies, since they went against the patriarchy (in China this was the case for example, the role of women in China improved drastically, while women and minorities are still struggling in Japan, which is a democracy). On the other hand, Nazi Germany was also a command economy, and yet it was very bad for minorities
I would say that the question is too complex to give just one answer, but I would also argue for option d)
<span>Although India has only 16 official languages, the people there speak more than 30 languages. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is option "A".
"</span>People in most societies cannot improve their status" is the one among the following choices given in the question that is true of social classes. the correct option is option "A".
Answer:
"Secondary analysis" seems to be the right answer.
Explanation:
- Secondary analysis or assessment seems to be a technique whereby secondary information is used in science. It saves the company money as either a survey instrument, as well as eliminates the needless credibility of the research committee.
- This is typically differentiated from the current study, which seems to be the study including its primary data something that an investigator separately collects.
And for the specified circumstance to be a secondary analysis.
