They both are required to apply and enforce the laws.
The differences between the two are in the jurisdictions. The jurisdiction on federal court is not as elaborate as state courts.
He served in office from Jan. 20th, 1961 to Nov. 22nd, 1963.
Answer: okay I’m too lazy to type it down but just look at the picture :)
The League of Nations was an international organization established in 1920, aimed at providing collective security in the international community to maintain world peace.
Further details about the League of Nations:
The United States never joined the League of Nations, in spite of the fact that an organization such as the League of Nations was the signature idea of US President Woodrow Wilson. He had laid out 14 Points for establishing and maintaining world peace following the Great War (World War I). Point #14 was the establishment of an international peacekeeping association. The Treaty of Versailles adopted that idea, but back home in the United States, there was not support for involving America in any association that could diminish US sovereignty over its own affairs or involve the US again in wars beyond those pertinent to the United States' own national security. The lack of involvement by the world's fastest-growing superpower, the United States, hampered its effectiveness.
The League of Nations had set out clear goals for what it intended to do. The main aims of the League were disarmament across nations, preventing war through collective security of the international community, settling disputes between countries through negotiation, and improving welfare of people around the globe. But it proved unable to meet those goals. The United Nations today has similar goals, and has been more effective in its efforts -- though there are still plenty of people who criticize the UN's effectiveness.
The Native Americans were forced to take sides during the American Revolution and they chose as follows:
British Side American Side
- Cherokee Oneida Nation
- Iroquois
In general, most Native Americans sided with the British because:
- the British had limited American colonial expansion westward into Native lands
- Britain had trading stations with the Natives where they exchanged goods with them
- Britain had influence over Native affairs as a result of those trading stations
In conclusion, most Natives sided with the British when they had to pick a side except the Oneida and the Tuscarora.
<em />
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/14841192. </em>
