Answer:
- The court should look to the intention of the founders.
Explanation:
Originalism is associated with the legal doctrine that believes in interpreting or determining the meaning of the words, phrases, or statements mentioned in the Constitution in context of 'the intention of the founders or authors' for ratification of such a clause or law in the Constitution. The originalist philosophy says that the constitution is required to be interpreted on the basis of initial/original understanding or intent of the founders instead of interpreting it in the present context. Therefore, the court should determine the meaning of the constitutional phrase on this philosophy and 'look to the intention of the founders'.
Answer:
nelson mandela the anti-apartherd leader who was jailed for 27 years of his activism and in 1994 because president of South America, regularly recited the poem inviictus during his imprisonment inviictus meaningunconnquerable of undefated in latin was written in 1875 by william Ernest henley
Answer: A
The past perfect progressive emphasizes the duration of a past action before another action happened. For example, “I had been smoking for 10 years before I quit.” You form the past perfect progressive by using had been followed by an –ing verb.
Answer:The statement “No students should be expelled from school” has so little words but huge meaning to me. Although my opinion to agree or disagree with this statement truely depends on the situation, the tone and voice of this statement does not. I believe that this has a straight forward and set down tone. Almost making the statement seem like it's talking to you. Telling you what is right and what is wrong. It may be short and possibly underdeveloped but it does not hold back on the brain. Even with having an ever changing opinion on this topic I still can feel that essance of an answer coming from it. As if the statement it self is the answer regardless of what I have to say.
With my opinion not yet in hand I must say I agree with this statement. That no students should be expelled from school. For no reason at all unless it is a legal concern. Meaning that unless somebody’s rights are being taken away or violated in an illegal fashion this rule should always apply. Considering we as humans have many rights applying towards us such as the 1st amendment being Freedom Of Speech it's just apparent that this should apply to everyone. Not just my school or the nearest school but every school in the united states. So it's not just my opinion but the constitution and laws opinion that no student should be expelled, but thats only considering ONE of the many reasons to this opinion of mine. There are so many logical reasons as to why I 100% agree with the statement “No Students should be expelled from school.”
Explanation:
Now I know this is knowhere near perfect at all but I wrote this as fast as I could to prevent atleast getting an F.
No, this is false.
Just because you are using your own words does not mean that you're not copying or stealing the ideas of others. So even if you paraphrase, you should give the source of the idea. In general it's always good to give a reference - I don't think that it is ever a bad thing, so you can do nothing wrong if you do it!
