All categories

3 years ago

What is 9 1/2 in simplest form?

Mathematics

2 answers:

iren2701 [21]3 years ago

7 0

9 1/2 is the simplest form. If you are looking for an improper fraction than it would be 19/2. Does this help?

algol133 years ago

7 0

Well first you have to change it to an imporper fraction then simplify from there

You might be interested in

Explain how to find 40×50 using mental math

Naya [18.7K]

Multiply 4 * 5, which equals 20, and add the two zeroes(from 40 and 50) on the end.

That gives us:

2000

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which two numbers go into the blanks so they add to be the bottom number but also multiply to be the top?

ss7ja [257]

Answer:

8 and 6

Step-by-step explanation:

8 * 6 = 48

8 + 6 = 14

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the factored form of 3x^2+21x-24

Oxana [17]

Answer:

3(x-1)(x+8)

Step-by-step explanation:

3x2+21x−24

=3(x−1)(x+8)

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Show me how to do this problem, 5550/ 10to the 3rd power

ICE Princess25 [194]

It should be 555^3=170953875

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

An article presents a study of the failure pressures of roof panels. A sample of 15 panels constructed with 8-inch nail spacing

wariber [46]

Answer:

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that six inches spacing has a higher mean failure pressure than 8 inches

Reject $H_0\ at\ 5%$ level of significance

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that:

Sample size 1 $n_1=15$

Spacing 1 $s_1=8$

Mean 1 $\=x_1=8.48$

Standard deviation 1 $\sigma_1=0.96 kPa$

Sample size 2 $n_2=16$

Spacing 2 $s_2=6$

Mean 1 $\=x_1=9.93$

Standard deviation 1 $\sigma_1=1.02 kPa$

Generally the hypothesis is mathematically given as

Null $H_0:\mu_1-\mu_2$

Alternative $H_a:\mu_1\mu_2$

Generally the equation for pooled estimate is mathematically given by

$S=\sqrt{\frac{(n_1-1)\sigma_1^2+(n_2-1)\sigma_2^2}{n_1+n_2-2} }$

Therefore

$S=\sqrt{\frac{(15-1)0.96^2+(16-1)1.02^2}{15+15-2} }$

$S=0.9905$

Generally the equation for test statistics is mathematically given by

$t=\frac{\=x_1+\=x_2}{S\sqrt{\frac{1}{n _1}+\frac{1}{n_2}}}$

$t=\frac{\=8.48-9.93}{0.9905\sqrt{\frac{1}{15}+\frac{1}{15}}}$

$t=-4.00091$

Therefore From table

$P value=P(t_{15+15-2}=4.00091)$

$P value=0.00041918$

$P$

Therefore

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that six inches spacing has a higher mean failure pressure than 8 inches

Reject $H_0\ at\ 5%$ level of significance

3 0

3 years ago