<u><em>Explanation</em></u>:
A. Right to Freedom of speech (anonymous speech).
This principle also guarantee the right to make an anonymous speech, thus making it lawful to do so.
B. However, giving persons right to maintain anonymity would make it unlawful for law enforcement to intrude peoples private conversation which they expect to be kept anonymously.
C. The question now is which is of greater importance? Is it public safety?, or allowing individual liberties even though it poses a threat to public safety?
I believe the answer is: <span>The Great Awakening caused a split in American Protestantism in the American Colonies.
During the great awakening, American Protestantism was divided into two different groups. One group believed that everybody is advocated to be christian preachers, while the other believe that only those who had study the subject thoroughly under church guidance are able to do so.</span><span />
Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, it was the support from his staff that most significantly reflected his prosperity.
Because of its lack of enforcement powers, most civil rights groups viewed the Commission as a "toothless tiger." EEOC made significant contributions to equal employment opportunity between 1965 and 1971 by using the powers it had to help define discrimination in the workplace
