Answer:
When he is less than two years old, Beauty observes the hunt pass by. He sees the hare's violent death and the serious injuries of two horses and one man. Some of the horses say it serves the men right, but Duchess disagrees. She claims she never understood why men hunt, for "they often hurt themselves, often spoil good horses, and tear up the fields, and all for a hare or a fox, or a stag, that they could get more easily some other way." But, she continues, "we are only horses, and don't know." They learn the injured man is Squire Gordon's only son, George Gordon, and he is very seriously hurt. The black horse that was injured has broken his leg and is shot to put him out of his misery. Beauty's mother is saddened by this death, saying the horse was one she knew, a good one named Rob Roy. Later Beauty observes the funeral for Squire Gordon's son, who also has died of his injuries.
The following are reasons to conclude that Hamlet had not gone mad:
- He told Laertes that he had acted strangely because he was temporarily insane. Someone who was truly mad will not know this fact.
- He knowingly acted wildly when the King and Polonius arranged a meeting to observe him.
- He was also sane because he overheard something that Polonius said over the curtain and killed her for it.
The above three points are reasons to believe that Hamlet was not actually mad in the story.
He was simply acting up because he could still process the events that were happening around him.
Learn more about inferences here:
brainly.com/question/16750080
Answer:
Noun
Explanation:
The word "enchantment" is a noun because it is a naming word that means to "hypnotise or draw the attention of someone to something".
It is derived from the word "enchant"
Answer:
I think it's the first or last option
Explanation:
