If scientists made medicine to live forever with no strings attached then maybe I would take it. It depends on who it is handing me it, If it was a bad person then no but if they were good people then maybe, I would only do it if my parents told me to. Did you know Sonnet 65 is by William Shakespeare and is one of several poems that discusses time, aging, and what writing can and cannot do to fight against these forces? Shakespeare's central theme is the opposition between the transitory, delicate nature of beauty and the devastating effect on the beauty of mortality and its principal instrument, time. The opening questions seem rhetorical, indirectly arguing the poet's conviction that beauty is no match for aging and death. Again I wouldn't know what to do if doctors or scientists gave me random medicine then I don't know. I know if the medicine was important then my parents would give it to me not random scientists.
I think it means if you hurt my friends, I will kill you.
Answer:
A. He does not include any information about Soviet technology for comparison to support his point.
Explanation:
While he does talk about how America will surpass its previous accomplishments, he never gives comparisons with Soviet Technology
Answer:
As he gains intelligence, Charlie realizes his co-workers, including Joe and Frank, seem afraid of him and are not so friendly anymore. Finally, Charlie recognizes that Frank and Joe used to laugh at him and never were his real friends. He feels foolish for being deceived by them.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is "These people succeeded because they understood that you can't let your failures define you—you have to let your failures teach you."
Explanation:
I looked at all the answers in the text and only this one had evidence behind it.
