Laura is checking on schedule feasibility.
She is doing everything in order to see whether each phase will run smoothly and according to her schedule. She wants to see if her schedule is possible at all, which is why she is making a timetable to prove her hypotheses.
Answer:
Jun's pressure and influence has invalidated Mika's consent.
Explanation:
By threatening Mika with prosecution if she doesn't set a discount for the sale of her house on the grounds of her debt to her, she has influenced Jun's consent or rather coerced it and therefore Mika's consent is invalidated in the agreement. Consent is free under law if contract and should be given under undue influence, duress or any other vitiating factor that will render the contract null and void such as the example above
Answer:
- 3.21%
Explanation:
In this question, we use the PV formula which is shown in the spreadsheet.
The NPER represents the time period.
Given that,
Future value = $1,000
PMT = 1,000 × 5% = 50
NPER = 34 years - 1 year = 33 year
Rate of interest = 9%
The formula is shown below:
= -PV(Rate;NPER;PMT;FV;type)
So, after solving this, the present value would be $581.42
Now the return would be
= Sale price + interest - purchase price
= $581.42 + $50 - $652.39
= -$20.97
And, the total return would be
= Return ÷ purchase price
= -$20.97 ÷ $652.39
= - 3.21%
Answer:
black bear
Explanation:
I've watched the office 10 times