The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966) required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be informed of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights.
Answer:
The correct answer is option a.
Explanation:
Accounting profit is the difference between total revenue earned and total explicit costs incurred in the process of production. Explicit cost is the direct cost involved in the production process.
The economic profit is the difference between the total revenue earned and the total explicit as well as the implicit cost incurred. The implicit costs are the indirect cost or opportunity cost of production.
Since accounting profit does not take into account implicit costs, it is greater than economic profit.
Answer:
Abraham Lincoln's position on slavery in the United States is one of the most discussed ... This would be the inevitable result, Lincoln said, because the latter's ... directly or indirectly, to prevent that slavery from dying a natural death—to find new ... the states that if they did not abolish slavery on their own, the institution would ...
Based on archaeological finds in Cantabria, humans have lived there an estimated 39,000 years.The first time that Cantabria was referenced was in the Roman Empire times.
