Answer:
We can list as similarities between these two empires their location, the way how they built their cities, and the period they build their empires. The differences, however, are more visible. For the differences, we can separate into two points: the government and the war practices.
Explanation:
The Babylonians were harsh with their laws. An example of this point is the Code of Hammurabi. Dated from around the year 1700 BC, this law agreement was based on the lex talionis, or "Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth". The violence of these laws is one of the main differences between Babylonians and Hittites.
The Hittites Law Code was more complex and consistent. This is because of their nomadism, and especially because they had the precept to capture their enemies. So, their laws must be range. We can name their laws based on the concept of causes, which means, your actions would be punished according to their strength. However, there was no death penalty (capital punishment), and many of the crimes were solved trough tax payments or fines.
When it comes to war, the Babylonians were not used to combat. Even if they had an army and the pretense idea of expansion, they were closer to the research and scholar world. Many astronomical discoveries were proceeded by the Babylonians. On the other hand, Hittites were warriors.
Answer:
The answer is "The Marshall Plan pursued containment through the use of the spread if Communism in Europe"
Bush's Doctrine of Preemption was a foreign policy approach anchored on a unilateral approach to protecting the best interests of the United States. President Bush <span>Bush took an oath to defend the United States from all enemies, both foreign and domestic. Consequently, he adopted a unilateral approach in accomplishing these.</span>
Answer:
explanation is below
Explanation:
It is philosphy or ethical system of confucianism is based on good deeds and morality.Being nice to elders and being kind to one another.
D. Live in the same towns and cities.
