<span>Cons
</span>Depression of wages may occur but this seems to be temporary.
Having workers willing to work for relatively low pay may allow employers to ignore productivity, training and innovation.
Migrants may be exploited.
Increases in population can put pressure on public services.
Unemployment may rise if there are unrestricted numbers of incomers.
There may be integration difficulties and friction with local people.<span>Positive
</span>Job vacancies and skills gaps can be filled.
Economic growth can be sustained.
Services to an ageing population can be maintained when there are insufficient young people locally.
<span>The pension gap can be filled by the contributions of new young workers and they also pay taxes.
</span><span>Pros
</span>Job vacancies and skills gaps can be filled.
Economic growth can be sustained.
Services to an ageing population can be maintained when there are insufficient young people locally.
The pension gap can be filled by the contributions of new young workers and they also pay taxes.
Immigrants bring energy and innovation.
<span>Host countries are enriched by cultural diversity.</span><span>
</span>
The correct answer is B, since that diagram best explains a cause and effect relationship that has shaped U.S. politics. In fact, restrictions on who can receive public campaign funds have contributed to the persistence of the two-party system.
Public funding of political campaigns in the United States is quite limited, so candidates end up going to private financing. This, in turn, only finances those who have real chances of getting the positions in the voting, which ends up closing the question between Democrats and Republicans, strengthening the two-party system.
Historians look for causes and effects that help to explain how and why events happened.
Answer:
Edward R. Murrow work against McCarthy
