1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Maksim231197 [3]
3 years ago
8

TRUE OR FALSE: Rich Vikings and their belongings were buried in ships at sea

History
1 answer:
vladimir1956 [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

In Norse mythology, boats symbolized safe passage into the afterlife on the same vessel that aided their travels in life, so they played a key role in funeral rites. For high-ranked Norsemen, the honors went a step further, and they were buried with their actual boats.  It was common for the dead’s goods to travel with them out into the water, this type of burial was not common however, and was likely reserved for sea captains, noble Vikings and the very wealthy.

You might be interested in
Please match the word(s) to the correct definition.
pshichka [43]

Answer:

1. Major John Pitcairn - He was wounded during the Battle of Bunker Hill and died shortly after. He was shot while attempting to rally the British troops.

2. Peter Salem - minuteman that served with the American forces at the Battle of Bunker Hill. Two different sources credited him with shooting British Major Pitcairn as he was attempting to rally the British troops.

3. Dr. Joseph Warren - He was the spy that sent warning, through the Midnight Riders, of the British moving on Lexington and Concord to seize the munitions stored there and to capture John Hancock and Samuel Adams. He served at Bunker Hill and was killed as he continued to stand his ground as the position was being overrun by the British forces.

4. Colonel William Prescott - Was chosen to lead 1,200 men to erect defenses on Bunker Hill. Under his command, the Massachusetts Militia forces withstood the British bombardment and two British assaults. His forces would be forced to retreat during the 3rd assault when they ran low on ammunition and the British overran the militia defenses.

5. Major General William Howe - British commander during the Battle of Bunker Hill. He chose to try to intimidate the colonial militia forces with a show of force rather than an effort to surround the position and force the militia to surrender. He ordered 3 assaults on the hill, which resulted in heavy losses to the British troops.

6. Charlestown, Massachusetts - The town was burned by the British on June 17, 1775, due to fire from sniper coming from the town, directed at British troops.

7. Pyrrhic Victory- is a "win" that inflicts such a devastating toll on the victor of the battle, that it can almost be considered a loss.

Explanation:

1. Major John Pitcairn was an officer of the British government sent to Boston, Massachusetts during the American War of Independence. He was killed by Peter Salem during the Battle at Bunker Hill while attempting to rally the British troops.

2. Peter Salem was the man credited with killing Major Pitcairn, a British officer stationed in Boston.

3. Dr. Joseph Warren was a spy who helped warn John Hancock and Samuel Adams about the incoming British troops to Lexington and Concord. Through the Midnight Riders, he helped save the ammunition that was stored but was killed during the Battle at Bunker Hill.

4. Colonel William Prescott was given the post of a commander in leading 1,200 men to erect defenses at Bunker Hill. And it was also under his command that the British's attacks were successfully withstood for the first two assaults but they were then defeated during the third assault due to a shortage of ammunition.

5. Major General William Howe was the Commanding officer during the Battle at Bunker Hill who used intimidation and force against the militia. His act of ordering continuous assaults led to a massive loss for the British troops.

6. Charlestown in Massachusetts was burned by the British troops on June 17, 1775, from a sniper's fire which was supposedly directed at the British troops.

7. Pyrrhic Victory is a term that is a "win" or victorious situation but which also incurs a huge loss for the winner. So, in simple terms, the victory isn't as successful as it should have been.

8 0
3 years ago
How did the outcome of world war ll contribute to the development of the cold war
Lynna [10]

Answer:

It resulted in the  United States and the Soviet union developing into the world’s most powerful state. A in short.

Hope this helps!

3 0
3 years ago
True ir false pls awnser
abruzzese [7]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Because, all of those things definitely would create civil wars.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Sen. Sumner almost start a war with England?
Cloud [144]

Answer:

Senator Charles Sumner, an abolitionist leader before the Civil War and a powerful foe of conciliation toward states that had seceded after the war, considered his field to be "in morals, not politics." He is best remembered for surviving an attack by Representative Preston Brooks in 1856 during which Brooks beat Sumner with a cane on the Senate floor. Brooks' attack was a sign of the increasing hostility between the North and South in the years leading up to the Civil War.

3 0
3 years ago
What makes farming possible in Central Asia’s dry climates?
spayn [35]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why did clause 39 of the magma carts influence the American Revolution?
    8·1 answer
  • Es
    12·1 answer
  • At the end of the 19th Century, what country won control of South Africa in the Boer Wars?
    7·2 answers
  • - criminal trespass
    6·2 answers
  • What’s the Texas law?
    12·2 answers
  • No links please.....​
    11·1 answer
  • What land area is represented by the symbol “A”?
    11·2 answers
  • What happened as a result of the Thirteenth Amendment?
    15·1 answer
  • Why did the United States and Britain agree that their priority was defeating Germany, then Japan?
    7·1 answer
  • Describe the process of Western Europe transforming from a unified Roman Empire in 330 to independent nation-states in 1500.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!