The correct answer is A. Slavery must not be allowed to spread to western territories. The Free-Soil Party was a political party in the United States from 1848 to 1852. The main opposition was the expansion of slavery on western territories. The Free-Soil Party believed that free men on free land were a superior system comparing it to slavery, because of the economical opportunities and possibilities. This political party was founded in New York after they denied the endorsement of the Wilmot Proviso law during the Democratic convention in that state; this act would have banned slavery on the newly acquired territory during the Mexican-American war.
The main problem that caused separation within the Democratic Party was the fact that during the New York Democratic convention of 1848, the Wilmot Proviso act was not endorsed. This act would ban slavery in territory acquired by the United States from México after the war. For the dislike of many members of a group called Barnburners –which was the name of two opposing ideas in the New York Democratic Party. The main idea separating both groups was slavery and those who opposed it. The Barnburners were the anti-slavery and the Hunkers were those who approved of slavery.
Though this political party had a short life, its impact in the political scenario was bigger. For one, they presented the American people with two Senators and fourteen Representatives on the 31st Congress from 1849-1851. They also ran with the banner ¨Free soil, free speech, free labor and free men.¨ These were the inspirations of the Free-Soil Party, and its main goal was to prevent the spread of slavery onto western territories.
Easy money/sound money. It was bimetallism or free silver was what he based his policy on for president. I hope this helps.
<span>without them, the small States would have carried little weight in the new government</span>
C- He hoped that congress would strengthen the laws against monopolies.
D- He was upset that laws preventing the formation of monopolies had failed.
E- He believed the government should control businesses operating across state lines.
are the three of Roosevelt’s perspectives on monopolies
In a speech given on August 31, 1910, in Osawatomie, Kansas, Roosevelt advocated what he called "the new nationalism." The central issue he argued was the state's protection of human welfare and property rights, but he also argued that human welfare is more important than property rights.
He argued that only a strong federal government can regulate the economy and guarantee justice and that a president can only achieve economic goals if he makes protecting human well-being his top priority. did. Roosevelt believed that industrial concentration was a natural part of the economy.
He wanted an administrative body (rather than the courts) to run his business. The federal government should be put in place to protect working men, women, and children from exploitation. Politically, Roosevelt's platform included a wide range of social and political reforms advocated by progressives.
Learn more about Roosevelt's new nationalism speech here: brainly.com/question/19958250
#SPJ1
When 9/11 happened the bombing
