Question

Which two arguments support judicial restraint?

Answer 1

Answer:

1. It is the job of the court to defer to the policy decisions of the executive branch.

2. It is the job of the court to consider precedent.

Explanation:

Answer 2

Answer:

1. It is the job of the court to defer to the policy decisions of the executive branch.

2. It is the job of the court to consider precedent.

Explanation:

Given that Judicial restraint is a form. of a procedural technique whereby judges were advised to stop taking a decision concerning legal issues, most specifically relating to constitutional ones, except in special cases where the decision is necessary as the main resolution of a substantial dispute between adverse parties.

Hence, in this case, the two arguments that support judicial restraints are:

1. It is the job of the court to defer to the policy decisions of the executive branch.

2. It is the job of the court to consider precedent.