All categories

3 years ago

Which two arguments support judicial restraint?

History

2 answers:

Trava [24]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

1. It is the job of the court to defer to the policy decisions of the executive branch.

2. It is the job of the court to consider precedent.

Explanation:

almond37 [142]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

1. It is the job of the court to defer to the policy decisions of the executive branch.

2. It is the job of the court to consider precedent.

Explanation:

Given that Judicial restraint is a form. of a procedural technique whereby judges were advised to stop taking a decision concerning legal issues, most specifically relating to constitutional ones, except in special cases where the decision is necessary as the main resolution of a substantial dispute between adverse parties.

Hence, in this case, the two arguments that support judicial restraints are:

1. It is the job of the court to defer to the policy decisions of the executive branch.

2. It is the job of the court to consider precedent.

You might be interested in

What are three similarities in the structure of the documents:

choli [55]

Answer:

It is easy to compare two documents for similarities. Choose the files, text, or URL you wish to compare and then upload the files on the comparison tool window. Once you click Compare, a report will be generated that displays the different types of similar text.

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Which statement best describes an effect of William Penn's actions on colonial America?

Pepsi [2]

<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that Penn created an unprecedented atmosphere of peace and civility in the colonies by welcoming people of all creeds and backgrounds.</span></span>

7 0

3 years ago

Review the events listed under “Work, Exchange, and Technology” and “Identity” for the period 1720-1750 on the thematic timeline

suter [353]

All through the 17 century, the Colonies had no legitimate government or control. The states were private endeavors with sanctions from the British government; however, nothing came in the method for the supervision of help in light of political strife in Great Britain.

After the chaos over the government was settled, Britain had been changed into a Constitutional Monarchy in which the crown and Parliament together dominated. England currently ended up more grounded and increasingly incorporated.

5 0

3 years ago

__________ is the strength to face danger or take on challenges despite fear.

Archy [21]

Answer:

Courage

Explanation:

is the strength to face danger or take on challenges despite fear.

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If you wanted to invest money and diversify your risk, what are some of the best strategies?

Alex17521 [72]

Answer: What exactly are you asking?

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago