All categories

3 years ago

Which two arguments support judicial restraint?

History

2 answers:

Trava [24]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

1. It is the job of the court to defer to the policy decisions of the executive branch.

2. It is the job of the court to consider precedent.

Explanation:

almond37 [142]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

1. It is the job of the court to defer to the policy decisions of the executive branch.

2. It is the job of the court to consider precedent.

Explanation:

Given that Judicial restraint is a form. of a procedural technique whereby judges were advised to stop taking a decision concerning legal issues, most specifically relating to constitutional ones, except in special cases where the decision is necessary as the main resolution of a substantial dispute between adverse parties.

Hence, in this case, the two arguments that support judicial restraints are:

1. It is the job of the court to defer to the policy decisions of the executive branch.

2. It is the job of the court to consider precedent.

You might be interested in

. Name three states where you think expensive, targeted campaigning occurs. Why did you pick these states"

spin [16.1K]

Answer:

The three States are:

1. Michigan

2. Ohio

3. New Hampshire

Explanation:

These States often receive the most expensive and targeted campaigns during elections since they are considered as 'Swing States'

Unlike 'Safe States' which are generally inclined towards one party, Swing States have a history of changing sides and voting for someone new in every election.

One year they might support a democratic candidate, while in another, they might side with the Republicans. Since it is extremely difficult to predict what they will do, and their decision plays a huge role in who wins the election, they are called 'swing States' and receive a lot of attention.

3 0

3 years ago

When and where was the "Gospel of Wealth" published

ki77a [65]

North America

in June 1889

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is one of the first things delegates to the constitutional convention decided on

Nesterboy [21]

One of the major compromises in the Constitutional Convention was between the small states and big states. The small states wanted each state to have the same number of representatives in Congress. The big states wanted representation based on population.

3 0

3 years ago

ULUH

OlgaM077 [116]

Answer:

1 day ago — Working hard on Southam sol. Someone softly spoke "Tailand tot, and toil and tol, And yet I'm always broke -Bewept from "The Land of Hope' by.

1 answer 0 votes: Answer: I am to lazy to readExplanation:so sorry about that but if I was to read I

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Effects of businesses consolidate through mergers

seraphim [82]

Effects of Mergers. When two or more companies merge, the resulting company has more resources than either of the original companies had alone. Because of its increased resources, it can often lower the prices of its goods and services, which, in turn, attracts more customers.

6 0

3 years ago