Answer:
What I think is the answer is A, An article about multiple brands of digital cameras, written by an independent reviewer in 2007
Explanation:
I think, this would be more better because a lot of older sources are primary sources which gives the perspective more information and they are more reliable.
Hope this helps you.
Answer:
Each new step in science reconciles twenty seemingly discordant facts as merely the various manifestations of a single principle.
Explanation:
Even though the only context we have is the sentence itself, we can safely choose number 2. This type of sentence is used when we wish to present contrasting ideas. There would be no reason, for example, for science to unify what is already harmonious, or to undermine what is already erroneous. Those ideas are redundant. It makes much more sense to say that science reconciles facts that are seemingly discordant. That is the wonder in science: to see different things as the manifestations of a single principle, which could seem, if science did not exist, impossible.
Answer:
It is disheartening and saddening to see majority of our students with no morals. I suggest we should instil our codes of conduct in everything we do. Any student that fails to abide by the rules governing the school should be punished. There should be no nepotism from the teachers and all the students should be judged fairly
Answer:
- He didn't use to study hard for the exam.
- She didn't use to spend a lot of money.
Explanation:
hope this helps and is right. p.s i really need brainliest :)
