Is this good evidence for learning what motivated American territorial expansion in the 1840s? Explain.

1 answer:

3 0

Hello. You did not submit the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for this question to be answered. However, I will try to help you as best I can.

A textual evidence is a statement that proves an argument or information presented by the author of a text. This statement explains why the information in the text is correct, how events presented in the text happened and even confirm facts and justify ideas presented in the text. In this case, to answer your question, you will have to read all the text that is related to it and identify the sentences that try to explain and show how the territorial expansion in 1840 happened. This evidence can be considered good and effective, if it presents historically proven justifications for territorial expansion, going so far as to prove to the reader that this expansion, in fact, happened, and presenting the reasons that established it.

You might be interested in

When did the allies liberate the philippiens

fiasKO [112]

Answer:

just use google it helps

Explanation:

The liberation of the Philippines commenced with amphibious landings on the eastern Philippine island of Leyte on October 20, 1944.

be safe, and good day

∵∴∵∴∵∴∵∴∵

⊕ΘΞΠΤ⊕

∵∴∵∴∵∴∵∴∵

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What caused the Armenian Genocide?

alexdok [17]

The Armenian Genocide happened in world war I due to the rising tension between the young Turk government and the christian Armenians. The Turks largely followed the teaching of jihad, or "the holy war'' which taught them to kill all non Muslims. The Armenian community was made up of three religious denominations: Armenian Catholic, Armenian Protestant, and Armenian Apostolic, the Church of the vast majority of Armenians. the Armenians, because they were not Muslim but Christian were killed in mass. Over 1.5 million Armenians were slaughtered.

4 0

3 years ago

How did stalin (USSR) stay president if he was so cruel to his people?

AfilCa [17]

Because the presidency was decided by a vote he simply rigged the vote. that and he had followers i mean one man against a whole country that doesn't like him doesn't seem to hard to pick the wjnner

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How do Martin Luther King Jr.'s experiences in the South affect his view of the Emancipation Proclamation 100 years after it bec

Gelneren [198K]

Answer:

It proclaimed the freedom of slaves in the ten Confederate states still in rebellion. It also decreed that freed slaves could be enlisted in the Union Army, thereby increasing the Union's available manpower.

So I'm guessing D or B.

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Connecting to a larger context

Maslowich

Answer:

This excerpt from document two connects to when the abolition of slavery was truly beginning to happen. Buchanan was a democrat who morally was against slavery but seemed to think the Constitution protected the rights of slave owners. " Should it be refused, then the Constitution, to which all the States are parties, will have been willfully violated by one portion of them in a provision essential to the domestic security and happiness of the remainder" . Buchanan states simply that if the southeners are refused their " rights " to have slaves then the peace that Anti and Pro slavery people, will no longer exist. I am meeting the essay's requirements for contextualization because I am quoting the context directly and using the context to help inform my audience.

Explanation:

This is what I wrote. It may not be right but I'm sure it is. You may want to read over it and edit it so it sounds like you wrote it.

4 0

3 years ago