Answer:
A. a president is more likely to appoint judges who would agree with him ideologically.
Explanation:
According to the Constitution, it is President who nominates judges for federal courts and the Supreme Court. After the nomination, it is Senate who appoint them based on informal criteria, as there's no criteria mentioned in the Constitution.
The most likely reason that appointment of judges by President is blocked is because the president is appointing judges who would agree with him ideologically. The Senate will block such nominations to ensure that judges who are appointed judge with justice and not under any influence from any political power.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Hey mate! Today the Gettysburg address can be found in Washington, D.C. hope this help u
<span>If you mean the first one, corruption was one reason. The Chinese navy and military were incredibly corrupt (as was the government) -- funds meant to buy ships and ammunition were often embezzled by officers for other uses. Pay in the army was low, morale was low, compared to the Japanese military which was also modernized but based on Western principles and proven tactics.</span>
The answer is it makes more sense then a c and d so pick B
that would be true hope this helps