I would say it's mostly climate, as it determines two things: 1) what can grow/live in a given place and 2) how long can the products be kept
Additionally, it's the closeness to such things as water sources where you can fish and trade routes: a lot of European cuisines include cofee products, even if cofee is not grown in Europe!
Before annie arrives, your roomate explains that annie will probably be late because she never helps with the work and always leaves him/her to take care of everything. Roomate is poisoning the well fallacy.
An informal fallacy known as "poisoning the well" occurs when unfavorable information about a target is revealed to an audience ahead of time in an effort to discredit or criticize something the target is about to say. John Henry Newman used the word "argumentum ad hominem" for the first time in the context of "poisoning the well" in his work Apologia Pro Vita Sua (1864). The phrase gets its name from the ancient military tactic of "well poisoning," which involved poison being poured into sources of fresh water in front of an advancing army in order to weaken it.
To know more about poisoning refer:
brainly.com/question/935499
#SPJ4
Answer:
<em>The correct answer is A) An interest group is using symbolism to turn people away from a plan that lawmakers are considering.</em>
Explanation:
The example is a typical way for interests groups to promote their agenda and beliefs and rally support for their cause.
This is a realistic example of a campaign you might see, since Nuclear Power is still a very controversial topic. Whenever a nuclear power plant is proposed in a region, law makers try to promote as a way to create more jobs in an area and provide cheaper electricity.
But time and again, across America, we have seen communities and families campaigning against the building of power plants close to their homes. This is mostly due to the danger of a fallout, radiation leaking and a general sense of danger for children.
In this example, the interest group is trying to portray the danger to the environment and the citizens of the United States, because they believe that the energy policy is wrong and depends too much on expanding Nuclear power.
The repeated behaviour has been <u>reinforced. </u>
This is deduced from the learning mechanism known as operant conditioning, that consists on reinforcing certain behaviours through rewards or punishments respectively depending on whether the aim is to increase or decrease their frequency.
If there is a positive or rewarding stimulus after the correct behaviour it increases the likelihood of the behaviour repeating again.
I believe it is A, sorry in advance though
