1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
diamong [38]
3 years ago
6

Write a five-hundred word report, detailing the specific problems that developed as a result of the weaknesses of the Articles o

f Confederation.
English
1 answer:
Alex Ar [27]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation comprised the United States’ first constitution, lasting from 1776 until 1789. The Articles established a weak central government and placed most powers in the hands of the states. Under the Articles, the US economy faltered, since the central government lacked the power to enforce tax laws or regulate commerce. Shays’s Rebellion, an uprising of Revolutionary War veterans in Massachusetts that both the state and national governments struggled to address due to a lack of centralized military power, illustrated the need to create a stronger governing system. The United States’ transition from a ragtag group of colonies to a successful independent nation was a little like the transition period from childhood to adulthood. As the colonies matured, American colonists grew to despise being treated as the children of Great Britain. Like rebellious teens, they vowed that when they won their independence, their government would be nothing like that of the mother country. It’s no surprise that when the leaders of the former colonies finally did get the chance to set up their own government as the new United States, they were mostly focused on trying to avoid what they had perceived as abuses wrought by an overly-powerful government. Their first constitution was called the Articles of Confederation. It bound the states together in a loose “league of friendship” that permitted the states to retain nearly all government power. The Articles of Confederation held the new United States together long enough for it to prevail in the Revolutionary War, but once the war was over the league of friends quickly became a league of impoverished quibblers. The Founders had been so concerned with making sure the central government couldn’t become too powerful that they neglected to make it powerful enough to solve the issues facing a new nation. The American states evolved from separate colonies, with unique histories and societies. In the years before and during the Revolution, they learned to find common cause with each other, but they hardly saw themselves as a unified nation. The Articles of Confederation exemplified this mindset. The document created a confederacy, in which states considered themselves independent entities linked together for limited purposes, such as national defense. State governments had the sovereignty to rule within their own territories. The national government had few powers. It could coin money, direct the post office, and negotiate with foreign powers, including Native American tribes. To raise money or soldiers, it could only request that the states provide what was needed. The national government had only one branch, the Confederation Congress, in which each state had one vote. Populous Virginia had no more political power than tiny Delaware. The requirements for passing measures were quite high: nine of the thirteen states had to approve a measure for it to pass. Amending the Articles themselves was even harder: all thirteen had to vote in favor of a change. One of the biggest problems was that the national government had no power to impose taxes. To avoid any perception of “taxation without representation,” the Articles of Confederation allowed only state governments to levy taxes. To pay for its expenses, the national government had to request money from the states. The states, however, were often negligent in this duty, and so the national government was underfunded. Without money, the US government could not pay debts owed from the Revolution or easily secure new funds. Foreign governments were reluctant to loan money to a nation that might never repay it. The fiscal problems of the central government meant that the currency it issued, called the Continental, was largely worthless. The country’s economic woes were made worse by the fact that the central government also lacked the power to impose tariffs on foreign imports or regulate interstate commerce. Thus, it couldn’t protect American producers from foreign competitors. Compounding the problem, states often imposed tariffs on items produced by other states and otherwise interfered with their neighbors’ trade. The national government under the Articles also lacked the power to raise an army or navy. Fears of a standing army in the employ of a tyrannical government had led the writers of the Articles of Confederation to leave defense largely to the states. Although the central government could declare war and agree to peace, it had to depend upon the states to provide soldiers. If state governors chose not to honor the national government’s request, the country would lack an adequate defense. The weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation became apparent to all as a result of an uprising of Massachusetts farmers known as Shays’s Rebellion. In the summer of 1786, farmers in western Massachusetts were heavily in debt, facing imprisonment and the loss of their lands.

You might be interested in
What constitutes a need for change?
Mrrafil [7]
Reason, research, resonance, redescription, rewards, real-world events, and resistance. Hope this helped! :D 
7 0
3 years ago
Which external conflict does the character face in this
bogdanovich [222]

character vs. character, because his father's words cause him to question his actionscharacter vs. nature, because he must battle the elements of weathercharacter vs. self, because he is struggling to understand how the gods livedcharacter vs. society, because he must battle against the teachings of the gods

character vs. self, because he is struggling to understand how the gods lived

Answer: Option 3.

<u>Explanation:</u>

In the field of literature, a conflict is a struggle that takes place between two different forces. It can be one side of the character with the other side of the character or between two people and so on.

In the lesson "By the waters of Babylon" the conflict and the struggle is between the character and the self. The sentence that is an evidence of this conflict is "I do not understand"they had ways"I wish that I knew".

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Like burnt-out torches by sick man's bed <br><br> Which technique is being used
Liono4ka [1.6K]

After doing some online searching, I've found that this question refers to figurative language. It is not an incomplete question, it was just missing the context for people to be able to understand it. Now that I know what it is about, I can safely answer:

Answer:

Simile.

Explanation:

In the phrase "Like burnt-out torches by a sick man's bed" we have something being compared to something else. Even though we don't know what it is, we know it is compared to burnt-out torches.<u> The comparison was made with the help of a support word, "like".</u> Its purpose it to attribute one or more qualities of a burnt-out torch to something else by saying they are similar. <u>Comparisons that use support words are called </u><u>simile.</u> They are a very common figure of speech along with metaphors, with the difference that metaphors also make comparisons, but without using support words.

7 0
3 years ago
What is the purpose of literary analysis?
padilas [110]

Answer:

to suggest and support an interpretation of literature

Explanation:

<em>to suggest and support an interpretation of literature</em> – <u>this is the correct answer. The literal analysis is careful reading and interpretation of the written piece.</u><u> The analysis should examine carefully characters, settings, atmosphere, imagery, and plot. </u>The full and scientific analysis should explore the meaning and the ideas behind the written piece, and use the literary theory that fits the work.

<em> to summarize a work of literature in great detail</em> – this is not the correct answer. Literary analysis is not just a summary of the piece.

<em />

<em> to evaluate how well a work of literature is written</em> – this is not the right answer. The analysis doesn’t grade up the quality of the piece.

<em />

<em> to suggest how a work of literature should be revised </em>– this is not the correct answer. Review or edit are the ones that suggest the revisions.

7 0
3 years ago
Select the correct answer.
Jlenok [28]

Answer:

I believe the answer is  C.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • (100 points for answer)
    9·2 answers
  • Please need some help on this
    6·1 answer
  • Write a story that ends with last straw breaks the camel's back​
    12·1 answer
  • You have to match the words to make another word, help anyone?<br><br> Level Of Need: Desperate
    6·2 answers
  • What was a goal of the League of Women Vote
    13·2 answers
  • Hebrews 11:31 - Based on this text, is faith more a belief or an action?
    13·1 answer
  • What words in the sentence is a noun? Our team played a great
    12·1 answer
  • NEED HELP! WILL GIVE BRAINEST!
    12·2 answers
  • How does lord of the flies end in the movie 60s
    11·1 answer
  • Are all humans capable of true evil? Why or why not?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!