All categories

3 years ago

What is the third term of the sequence defined by the recursive rule f(1)=3 f(n)=f(n-1)+4

1 answer:

5 0

What is the third term of the sequence defined by the recursive rule f(1)=3 f(n)=f(n-1)+4

Need f(2):

f(2)=f(2-1)+4
f(2)=f(1)+4
f(2)=(3)+4=7

FIND f(3):
f(3)=f(3-1)+4
f(3)=f(2)+4
f(3)=(7)+4
f(3)=11

You might be interested in

Word form for 49.564

d1i1m1o1n [39]

Answer:

49 decimal five hunderd sixty four

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Question 1

allochka39001 [22]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Perimeter of quarter circle = r + r + $\frac{1}{4}*2*\pi *r$

$= 10 + 10 + \frac{1}{4}*2*3.14*10\\\\= 10 + 10 + 3.14*5\\\\\\= 10 + 10 + 15.70\\\\= 35.70 cm$

2) d = 2*10 = 20 cm

Perimeter of semicircle = diameter + (1/2) * circumference of circle

$= 20 + \frac{1}{2}* 2*\pi *r\\\\= 20 + \frac{1}{2}*2*3.14*10\\\\= 20 + 3.14*10\\\\= 20 + 31.4\\\\= 51.40 cm$

3) Perimeter of three-quarter = r + r + (3/4)* circumference of circle

$= 10 + 10 + \frac{3}{4}*2*\pi *r\\\\= 10 + 10 + \frac{3}{4} * 2 * 3.14 * 10\\\\= 10 + 10 + 3 * 3.14 * 5\\\\= 10 + 10 + 47.1\\\\= 67.1 cm$

5 0

3 years ago

Somebody help hurry ASAP

Alex777 [14]

Answer:

the answer is 1

Step-by-step explanation:

the bottom says 6 and the other top says 7 so the only right answer is 1

7 0

3 years ago

Kate Alexander worked 40 hours last week. Her pay rate is $8.50 per hour. Assuming 7.65% social security withholding, how much s

Andrej [43]

40 x 8.50 = 340
340 x .0765 = 26.01

So the employer should withhold $26.01 from her check for social security.

8 0

3 years ago

In the July 2007 issue, Consumer Reports examined the calorie content of two kinds of hot dogs: meat (usually a mixture of pork,

kifflom [539]

Answer:

Since we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, then if we construct an interval of 95% of confidence, the 0 should be included, because on the test hypothesis we conclude that there would be no significant difference between the means of the two groups analyzed, and the results obtained on the hypothesis test needs to be consistent with the confidence interval.

Step-by-step explanation:

A hypothesis is defined as "a speculation or theory based on insufficient evidence that lends itself to further testing and experimentation. With further testing, a hypothesis can usually be proven true or false".

The null hypothesis is defined as "a hypothesis that says there is no statistical significance between the two variables in the hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that the researcher is trying to disprove".

The alternative hypothesis is "just the inverse, or opposite, of the null hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that researcher is trying to prove".

$\bar x_{meat}=111.7$ represent the sample mean of calories for the meat hot dogs

$\bar x_{beef}=135.4$ represent the sample mean of calories for the beef hot dogs

The system of hypothesis on this case would be:

Null hypothesis: $\mu_{meat}-\mu_{beef}=0$

Alternative hypothesis: $\mu_{meat}-\mu_{beef}\neq 0$

On this case we have the p value obtained, after calculate the statistic and we got that $p_v =0.124$ if we select a 5% significance level $\alpha=0.05$ we see that $p_v >\alpha$ and on this case we can FAIL to rejec the null hypothesis, so there is not a significant difference between the mean of the two tpes of hot dogs analyzed at 5% of significance.

And since we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, then if we construct an interval of 95% of confidence, the 0 should be included, because on the test hypothesis we conclude that there would be no significant difference between the means of the two groups analyzed, and the results obtained on the hypothesis test needs to be consistent with the confidence interval.

8 0

4 years ago