1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MAVERICK [17]
2 years ago
9

After U.S.-led invasions in the early 2000s, Afghanistan and Iraq changed from dictatorships to democracies. Is it right to spre

ad democracy by force? Pair up with a friend and choose opposite sides to the debate. Write your arguments in the spaces below.
Pro Con
History
1 answer:
rodikova [14]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Although the United States intervened in Iraq after it began its intervention in Afghanistan, it is withdrawing from Iraq first. Therefore, what the United States has and has not accomplished in Iraq will be discussed first.

It must be said to begin with that the United States did achieve some important successes in Iraq. It destroyed the brutal regime of Saddam Hussein — something that the Iraqi population had not only been unable to do on its own, but may not have been able to do later either. If Saddam had managed to transfer power to his sons (who were reportedly just as, or even more, vicious than their father), the regime may have survived for years or even decades.

In addition, the U.S.-led intervention helped the Kurds in northern Iraq. They had suffered terribly under Saddam Hussein but were able to solidify the tenuous autonomy they had achieved (also with U.S. help) after the 1990-91 Kuwait conflict and even build some prosperity in their zone.

Although Iraq’s Arab Sunni tribes were initially hostile to the U.S.-led intervention and fought an insurgent war against it, American forces were eventually able to make peace and work with most of them.

Most important, the United States organized and protected the holding of relatively free and fair elections at both the national and local levels. This allowed Iraq’s Arab Shia majority, which had also suffered dreadfully under Saddam Hussein, to play a leading role in Iraqi politics for the first time.

In addition to these successes, however, the United States has had some noteworthy failures in Iraq. First, the failure to halt the massive violence, looting and infrastructure breakdown that took place throughout the country immediately after the collapse of Saddam Hussein’s regime. This was caused by the Bush administration’s failure to anticipate and plan for the aftermath of Saddam’s downfall as well as to deploy enough troops to maintain order. As a result, the initial gratitude displayed by much of the Iraqi population toward the United States for delivering it from Saddam quickly disappeared.

Further, despite a massive troop presence, the United States was unable to prevent or stop the large-scale ethnic-cleansing campaigns that violent Arab Sunni and Arab Shia groups conducted against each other’s communities. These campaigns were so successful that some observers attributed the decline in violence in Iraq in 2008-09 not to the American troop surge ordered by President Bush, but to the ethnic-cleansing campaigns having largely completed the violent work of segregating the Sunni and the Shia communities from each other.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The Kyoto protocol's policies and measures squarely blame which of these factors as the MAIN causes of climate change?
ANTONII [103]

Answer:

the release of green houses gases and other pollutions.

3 0
2 years ago
Which of the following best describes the Supreme Court's de-
creativ13 [48]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

its right

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was an advantage held by Spanish conquistadores to help defeat the Aztecs? A. Braver soldiers B. Metal we
AleksandrR [38]
I believe that would be B. Metal weapons and armor
Hope it helps!
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which describes the reason for hardship in the Muslim world during the time of the European Middle Ages
Evgen [1.6K]

Answer:

Muslim nobles subjected most Muslims to a miserable, difficult life of serfdom. Christians from the Byzantine Empire continually tried to convert Muslims to Christianity.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Instruction
Kipish [7]
Encourages; encourages; increases
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is an economic effect of adding healthier options to a school lunch program
    6·2 answers
  • What were the core differences in the methods and agendas of the Knights of Labor and the American Federation of Labor?
    13·1 answer
  • MULTIPLE CHOICE PLEASE HELP!!!
    12·1 answer
  • Why did portugal build trade forts on the west african coast, rather than go into the interior to trade?
    6·2 answers
  • Many southern states banned the publication of abolitionist material true or false​
    14·1 answer
  • How was the Japanese government structured during the 1930s?
    12·1 answer
  • What were the two main disagreements about in the constitutional convention
    15·1 answer
  • What was the importance of Sutter's Mill?
    5·2 answers
  • Why did the idea of France on its doorstep bother the US more than Spain on its doorstep?
    14·1 answer
  • Discuss the historical processes that have led to the current position of Native American Indians in American society
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!