At home tending to the house and the children.
The introduction of silk into the Mediterranean caused the Abbasid Empire to be succesful in trade.
As the Silk Road passed through the center of the Abbasid territory, the merchants had to pay taxes to the Empire to be able to pass their products. This made that, due to the massification of silk in Europe, many more merchants used the route and, therefore, the Abbasid Empire was enriched. Thanks to this and the great cultural exchange through this route, there was a cultural renaissance and translations into Arabic of Greek, Persian and Syriac texts were made, and based on this knowledge, great scientific advances were made too. Industry and commerce also boomed.
Considering the assertions made by Peter N. Stearns, the reasons he provided in defense of his
assertion that history is useful in the world of work includes "<u>studying history leads to the good upbringing of businesspeople, professionals, and political leaders.</u><u>"</u>
<h3>Some other reasons Peter N. Stearns provided are:</h3>
- Student history helps build people in professions like law and public administration.
- It helps in analysis skills.
- It improves the proficiency to find and analyze sources of information.
- Studying history helps to recognize and assess diverse interpretations, etc.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that there are various reasons Peter N. Stearns, gave on how history is useful in the world of work.
Learn more about the benefits of History here: brainly.com/question/2875725
The demand for wool increased in Britain in the early 1700s, which led to the development of the domestic system. In this labor system, the need for workers was met by families who produced goods in their own homes. This was helpful to workers in some ways, but did have disadvantages Work done in this way was very time consuming and tedious. Children were used as workers to help their families, and typically were only educated in skills needed to add to the family income. Finally, a worker's connection to their individual village often were severed, as they became part of a larger production process. (Image: Courtesy of historylearningsite.co.uk)
<span>During the 1600s and 1700s, the economies of the middle colonies were largely a "mix" of the agricultural South, and the more mercantile-based North. </span>