Answer:
The correct explanation is that the Gulf of Tonkin resolution was signed on August 7, 1964 signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson.
Explanation:
The intent of the resolution was made by trying to keep the peace in South Asia after the incident against the U.S. Naval in the coast of Vietnam.
For the case of Japan, in 1868 new government of Japan underway
after Shogun decided to reestablish prerogatives of the Emperor's removal in
peace. Political style had altered from the shogunate to constitutional empire,
which constitution was founded on German's Staatsrecht those days. Japan
was reorganized and swayed by western society and culture but Japanese
government didn't follow as same. Instead Japan adapt and select some parts of
them only very suitable for them. Japan tried to draw near with West and
USA. They completed a lot of allocation to get worldwide rational, knowledge
and education for evading from the closed society (national isolation) in the
world.
For the case of the US, Twain and Warner were not erroneous
about the era’s exploitation, but the years between 1877 and 1900 were likewise
some of the utmost significant and active in American history. They set in signal
advances that would mold the country for generations like the reunification of
the South and North, the incorporation of four million anew unbound African
Americans, westward growth, immigration, industrialization, and urbanization.
Before the act of emancipation was approved in July 1776, the Thirteen Colonies and the Kingdom of Great Britain had been at war for more than a year. Relations between the two had deteriorated since 1763. The British Parliament enacted a series of measures to increase taxes in the colonies, such as the Stamp Act of 1765 and the Townshend Act of 1767. The Legislative Body considered that these regulations were a legitimate means for the colonies to pay a fair share for the costs of keeping them in the British Empire.
However, many settlers had developed a different concept of the empire. The colonies were not directly represented in the Parliament and the settlers argued that this legislative body had no right to assign taxes. This fiscal dispute was part of a greater divergence between the British and American interpretations of the Constitution of Great Britain and the scope of Parliament's authority in the colonies. The orthodox view of the British - dating back to the Glorious Revolution of 1688 - argued that Parliament had supreme authority throughout the empire and, by extension, everything that Parliament did was constitutional. However, in the colonies the idea had developed that the British Constitution recognized certain fundamental rights that the government could not violate, not even Parliament. After the laws of Townshend, some essayists even began to question whether the Parliament had any legitimate jurisdiction in the colonies. Anticipating the creation of the Commonwealth of Nations, in 1774 the American literati - among them Samuel Adams, James Wilson and Thomas Jefferson - discussed whether the authority of Parliament was limited only to Great Britain and that the colonies -which had their own legislatures- they should relate to the rest of the empire solely because of their loyalty to the Crown.
When Columbus came to the New World, he made a mistake and thought that he had found a new direct route to India, so he called the natives "Indians", which they are sometimes still referred to as to this day.
Hope that helped! =)
