Answer:
The correct answer is D. In the case of Bush v. Gore (2000), the Court ruled that the vote recount in Florida interfered with the candidates’ equal protection under the law because different counties had different methods of recounting the votes.
The Supreme Court ruled that the decision of the Florida Supreme Court to order a recount in the entire state would violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. Seven judges voted in favor and two against, but two of the seven judges disagreed with the solution proposed by the other five to remedy the violation. The Court held that the Equal Protection Clause guarantees voters that their vote can not be evalued by "subsequent arbitrary or heterogeneous treatment". Although the recount was right in theory, according to the Court it was not in practice: the documentation provided to the Florida Supreme Court showed that the different counties and also the different constituencies followed different methods for the recount, although in many cases the ballot papers and the machines used for counting votes were identical.
Explanation:
Have A Wonderful Day !!
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I think Japan's decision to attack Pearl Harbor was justified from the perspective of the Japanese Army according to the circumstances of that moment during World War II.
The Japanese wanted retribution for the recent oil embargo decision of the United States. In August 1941, the US federal government imposed an oil embargo as a punishment for the Japanese invasion and presence over different regions of Asia.
Japanese officials considered that an unexpected attack over the navy base of Pearl Harbor, in Hawaii would severely diminish the navy vessels on the United States in the Pacific, opening the way for a powerful Japanese presence in the area.
Answer:
Explanation:
Here's what happens after the court agrees to hear the case: The Court receives the transcripts. Both sides file lengthy case briefs. Lawyers for both sides make oral arguments before the court.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can comment on the following.
The power the government is expressing is its power granted by the 10th Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Yes, the federal government has the power to construct interstate highways.
The 10th Amendment promotes a balance of power between the Federal and State governments in the federal system.
In less complicated terms, the 10th Amendment to the United States Constitution refers to the idea that any power that is not considered to the federal government is given to the states. On September 5, 1789, the amendment was added to the US Constitution. Literally, the 10th Amendment says: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the States respectively or the people." The amendment respects the principle of federalism and gives the states the faculty to have some rights to create a balance of powers.
Furthermore, the Highway Act of 1956, strengthen the power of the federal government to construct highways.
