Answer:
No.
Explanation:
Every one deserves an explanation. You can't give a answer without backup. It wouldn't be fair to the other and it can cause a whole controversy.
Answer:
yes i agree
Explantion:
probabyProbably hes too unfit to speak LOL
Answer:
Rodney should win the case because he showed up to do the work but Yolanda failed to perform her part of the contract (provide the paint).
The legal term used to describe Rodney's offer of performance is tender or attempted performance. In this case, Rodney (the promisor) went to Yolanda's house and offered to perform his painting services. Yolanda (the promisee) did not perform her part of the contract by not providing the paint, so the promisor was unable to perform. Since Rodney's non-performance was directly caused by Yolanda's non-performance, he is not liable for anything since Yolanda lost her rights because she breached the contract first.