"Aggressor" is a fairly political and loose term. I believe they were both proportionally bad in the situation. However since you are likely looking for an argument for one side, I suppose I would have to go with the USSR. They started the Berlin blockade which both violated treaties and nearly led to a large war. At the time in Russia, if anyone disagreed with their secular agenda or government they would be exiled. I think it's important though to again point out that contrary to popular belief, both sides got into unwanted wars and did aggressive things during the time and neither should be dubbed the only "aggressor"
In Uttarakhand in northern India
The appropriate response is the National Organization for Women. It is the biggest association of women's activist grassroots activists in the United States. Presently has several sections and countless individuals and activists in every one of the 50 states and the District of Columbia.
This is false. It does hinder because a clique is a group that excludes others, it is the definition of a clique.
Answer:
Technology has made our society make it to the point of ignorance to the fact that there might be a day when our technology does not work and they cannot, at the moment, live without it. We have grown to rely on our technology to make our lives easier.
Explanation: