<span>Machiavelli was an Italian Renaissance Philosopher and statesman, through his works he often argued that political life could perhaps be excused for performing violent and deceptive actions which would not be a right in private life. He described how neither moral or religious rules alone were sufficient in governing. Because of this Machiavelli was often criticized and misunderstood by critics of the time because of this view he had on the relationship between politics and ethics. He was regarded as opportunistic and manipulative for this reason.</span>
<span>When
it was over, the Viet Cong basically ceased to be an effective force
any longer. Their ranks were decimated. All of the territory lost during
the offensive was shortly won back. But the ability of the Communists
to launch such a widespread coordinated offensive convinced the American
media and ultimately the American public that the war was now a lost
cause and demanded a withdrawal. So, tactically, it was a military
success for the U.S. but it served as a public relations success for
North Vietnam.
I believe the answer may be </span>
<span>U.S. forces dealt the Vietcong a massive military loss and regained control of all areas that the Vietcong had attacked.</span>
The reasons the United States wrote and proposed the declaration of independence is listed in the main body, located by the grievances. However, in summary, Enlightenment thinkers such as John Locke, Voltaire, and Montesquieu gave people light and hope of their own self worth. England was raising major taxes and trampling on the human rights, proposed by John Locke. Overall, England was raising major taxes, and treating the colonies unfairly.
Answer: Scorpius and Orion are two very know Greek mythology gods Orion swore he would kill every single animal on earth another known Goddess is Artemis and her mother Leto sended a Scorpion to exterminate Orion Zeus another Very well know god the God of all Gods put the Scorpion heavens after it won the battle.
Explanation:
They had an idea of making it new, that is, of making a new type of literature with the person being at the center of attention. They wanted to show that people are complex and not just archetypes in a society and that regardless of how you behave publicly, you also have a deep psychological side to you that nobody knows and that motivates you and affects your behavior.
