The treaty was signed by two kings, by the names of "..........." and "..........".
They are connected because the fight against fascism during World War II delivered to the forefront the contradictions between America's ideals of democracy and equality and its treatment of racial minorities. Throughout the war, the NAACP and alternative civil rights organizations worked to end discrimination within the military.
Compare - Both the texts was regarding the struggle and fight for civil rights with peaceful nonviolent protests.
Contrast - Lynne Olson's 'The most daring of our Leaders' was more about segregation and non-violence protests for civil rights movement. John Lewis' 'Speech from the Democratic National Convention' mentioned how to progress and move forward instead of looking back at past and exercise their right to vote.
Explanation:
Adapted from the texts by Lynne Olson's 'The most daring of our Leaders' and John Lewis' 'Speech from the Democratic National Convention'
Compare - Both the texts was regarding the struggle and fight for civil rights with peaceful nonviolent protests.
Contrast - Lynne Olson's 'The most daring of our Leaders' was more about segregation and non-violence protests for civil rights movement. John Lewis' 'Speech from the Democratic National Convention' mentioned how to progress and move forward instead of looking back at past and exercise their right to vote.
Textual Evidence cited from Lynne Olson's 'The most daring of our Leaders' states -
- "The more Nash found out about segregation in Nashville, the more she felt 'stifled and boxed in'".
- "But segregation still firmly ruled in theaters, restaurants, hotels, and libraries"
- "The young minister talked about the power of nonviolent confrontation with evil, about overcoming the forces of hate and transforming society though love and forgiveness."
Textual Evidence cited from John Lewis' 'Speech from the Democratic National Convention' mentions-
- "I was one of the 13 original 'Freedom Riders'".
- "We said, "No we come in peace, love and nonviolence." We said our struggle was not against individuals, but against unjust laws and customs. Our goal was true freedom for every American."
- "A few years ago, a man from Rock Hill, inspired by President Obama's election, decided to come forward. He came to my office in Washington and said, "I am one of the people who beat you. I want to apologize. Will you forgive me?" I said, "I accept your apology."
- "This man and I don't want to go back; we want to move forward."
It is correct to infer that the words “slavery,” “devils,” and “murderer” evoke a sense of: "anger and injustice." (Option A)
<h3>
What does it mean to evoke?</h3>
As used in this context, "Evoke" means "communicates" or "relates", or "connotes".
The context of the text is such that the narrator speaks against the ills and injustice being suffering by a select few under the authority indicate therein.
Learn more about inferences at;
brainly.com/question/26869005
#SPJ1
Present Participle
Explanation:
In the given sentence Present Participle tense is used.
Here the Band Director is going to organize the fall musical. Hence it is going to happen which falls under present participle category.
Here the verb is prefixed by "is" and the verb ends with "ing". Hence from the above statements it is clear that Sentence type belongs to PRESENT PARTICIPLE.
