The war started when the romans sent an at army to sicily to prevent a carthaginian takeover. Rome crushed carthage's navy off the coast of sicily and <span>then the island then came under roman rule.</span>
Answer:
President Andrew Johnson
Explanation:
With the assassination of President Lincoln in 1865, it was up to President Andrew Johnson to try to reunite former enemies. The Reconstruction Acts of 1867 laid out the process for readmitting Southern states into the Union.
Answer:
Lincoln :
- believed slavery should not spread
- believed slavery embarrassed the United States in the eyes of the world
Douglas :
- believed states should decide if they want to allow slavery
- believed blacks and whites were not equal
Explanation :
Lincoln used the establishment of slavery as his main platform during the presidential election. He believed that there is no justifiable cause to enslave other human beings, even if we look at it from both economic and human rights perspective.
In economic perspective, industrial revolution have created a way for business to mass produce their goods without needing the work of slaves anymore. In human rights perspective, Lincoln believe that humans are created equal regardless of the color of their skin.
Other Industrialized nations such as England has abolish slavery for around 30 years at that time (in 1833). The fact that United States still did it was an embarrassment in the eyes of the world.
Douglas Believed the exact opposite. He believed that white people are superior to the Blacks. So it is in their divine rights to justify enslaving and 'guide' them. He also believe that the federal government shouldn't determine whether slavery should exist or not. All of that power should be given to the stats.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/14876195#readmore
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Rome's location in the Italian Peninsula and in the Tiber River provided access to trade routes, trade equaled influence in foreign nations.
The most striking parallel between what each historian claims about the Mongols' influence on surrounding societies is that they almost wiped them out during an initial conquest or as reprisal for revolt.
<h3>What exactly are the Mongols?</h3>
The Mongols are a Central Asian ethnographic community of tribal peoples that live mostly on the Mongolian Plateau, speak a similar language, and have nomadic lives.
<h3>What is the most significant distinction between what each historian claims about the Mongols' influence on surrounding civilizations?</h3>
The key difference in how they describe the impact of the Mongols on the surrounding civilization is that the first writer focuses on the benefits of the Mongols after they conquered neighboring civilizations, whereas the second author concludes their description with a picture of a barbaric and brutal Mongolian dynasty.
<h3>What is one historical circumstance that might explain for the two historians' opposing viewpoints?</h3>
It is possible to conclude that the one element that accounts for the disparities in their perspectives is the individual who was at the helm of government during the times described.
The first author tells the story only from the historian's perspective of Genghis Khan, but the latter also covers Tamerlane's rule.
Learn more about the Mongols at:
brainly.com/question/17835217
#SPJ1
