Answer:
do not smile or make silly faces
Explanation:
The poet described about the kill of the Element is given below.
Explanation:
In the 1920s a young would-be poet, an ex-Etonian named Eric Blair, arrived as a Burma Police recruit and was posted to several places, culminating in Moulmein. Here he was accused of killing a timber company elephant, the chief of police saying he was a disgrace to Eton. Blair resigned while back in England on leave, and published several books under his assumed name, George Orwell.
In 1936 these were followed by what he called a “sketch” describing how, and more importantly why, he had killed a runaway elephant during his time in Moulmein, today known as Mawlamyine. By this time Orwell was highly regarded, and many were reluctant to accept that he had indeed killed an elephant. Six years later, however, a cashiered Burma Police captain named Herbert Robinson published a memoir in which he reported young Eric Blair (whom he called “the poet”) as saying back in the 1920s that he wanted to kill an elephant.
All the same, doubt has persisted among Orwell’s biographers. Neither Bernard Crick nor DJ Taylor believe he killed an elephant, Crick suggesting that he was merely influenced by a fashionable genre that blurred the line between fiction and autobiography.
To me, Orwell’s description of the great creature’s heartbreakingly slow death suggests an acute awareness of wrongdoing, as do his repeated protests: “I had no intention of shooting the elephant… I did not in the least want to shoot him … I did not want to shoot the elephant.” Though Orwell shifts the blame on to the imperialist system, I think the poet did shoot the elephant. But read the sketch and decide for yourself.
Answer:
Hamlet uses the word woman instead of Queen or Gertrude, his mother's name. This word choice demonstrates Hamlet's upset or disappointed tone; he is so upset with her that he cannot even say her name. The exclamation point shows that Hamlet is angry and agitated. Hamlet's use of frailty adds to an angry tone.
Explanation:
Answer:
sjajaajjasskksskowoejejehr sorry i don't know the answers
Answer:
A). Effective. Chairman Reed is reminding participants of the rules for discussion, acknowledging Mr. Hollembeak’s point of view, and asking him to support his point of view with facts.
Explanation:
Chairman Reed is an effective moderator as he not only fulfills his responsibility but acknowledges the opinions of the participants. His decisions are ethical and unbiased because he admires the point of view of the participants but at the same time, he asks them to substantiate their claims with facts. <u>He interacts with the participants and constantly reminds them about the rules of discussion which reflects his sense of accountability</u>. His positive and unprejudiced attitude offers comfort to the participants and gains their trust. Thus, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.
