Answer: Citizens have very little influence over the government.
Explanation:
Because I'm smart
First off, it is largely rural. There are a few medium-sized cities here, but other than that, this is a very rural area. The fact that our overall living standards are high and good is both a pro and a drawback; they are expensive, but most jobs pay well enough (well regulated minimum wages). The politicians, despite their flaws, are generally not outright wicked people who exploit us, and the checks and balances system works. It is one of the safest countries, fairly egalitarian, has no true social hierarchy (compared to most of the rest of the world), and has strong press freedom. Strong worker rights exist, and society as a whole functions well. And of course its spacious and a lot of decent natural sites. Yeah, as another con i can add that it may be hard, unless you have a very outgoing personality to get friends as an adult. Of course it is easier if you are in certain organizations (sports, hobby, religious).
First, there were two independent clinical psychologists who were present or on call 24 hours a day. They had the power to intervene and to remove anyone from the study if they thought they were in distress.
Second, we had paramedics and security guards on hand and ready to intervene at a moment’s notice if anything untoward happened in the study.
Third, the study was constantly monitored by members of a five-person independent ethics panel. This was chaired by a Member of Parliament and also included members of the Holocaust Educational Trust, the Howard League for Penal Reform, the BBC’s Independent Editorial Policy Unit and a senior academic psychologist. This committee had the power to change the way the study as a whole was run and to terminate it if they had ethical concerns.
http://www.bbcprisonstudy.org/bbc-prison-study.php?p=27