Answer:
There are a total of 435 representatives in the House of Representatives. Further, there are a total of 100 senators in the Senate.
Explanation:
In the House of Representatives, the number of seats is based on the portion of population for each state. Each state regardless of population is each delegated one representative. With each decennial census (every 10 years), the House of Representatives continued to increase in size as the United States population kept increasing. In 1910, the House numbers were stopped at 435. Based on the Permanent Appointment Act of 1929, the number stays at 435. In the areas of American Samoa, District of Columbia, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands, each area gets one non-voting delegate because these areas are not permanent states. Instead, they are just territories owned by the United States. Overtime, the number of representatives have changed due to adding one representative each for Alaska and Hawaii in 1959. States may lose votes because a decline in population or states may gain votes because of a increase in population. Moreover, the total number of House representatives stays at 435.
In the Senate, each state regardless of population are given two Senators to represent the state in the Senate. The total number of states is 50 so 2 times 50 creates a total of 100 Senators.
Having House of Representatives being determined by population and all states electing the same number of Senators is all apart of the checks and balances that make the United States a free country that works fairly and properly for all its citizens.
<span>The answer is referent power. In addition, the
referent power is </span><span>solitary of the five bases
of social power, as defined by Bertram Raven and his contemporaries
in 1959 and it pass on to the capability of a leader to persuade a follower since
of the supporters loyalty, respect, companionship, appreciation, affection or a
aspiration to achieve.</span>
Answer:
The question above only has question 1, the question (2) is empty so an answer would be provided for question 1. The answer to the question above is given below:
Explanation:
"Civilian" in the question is someone who is not trained to serve a nation in the armed forces such as the military, police force unit Though, in some countries, civilians work in those units to perform other tasks like overseeing the military duties or ensure payment of salaries but they don't wear uniforms.
An elected public official as the commander-in-chief is a civilian elected by the citizens of a particular country by voting or other systems to take charge as the chief controller of the country's armed forces.
one advantage of having a civilian who is an elected public official as the commander-in-chief is:
1. Some countries in the world frown against military governments from other countries and they prefer a civilian as the commander-in-chief because the civilian commander-in-chief shows the choice of the people and this gives the civilian commander-in-chief the authority to make executive agreements with other countries. It allows some decision-making to pass through the country's senate thereby eliminating some lone decision-making power that may be found when a military official is a commander-in-chief.
Prosecutors are the people who gets to say if the person stays at the jail until trial or they get to tell the judge that says this person is dangerous to the community
