Answer:
The argument seems logical but...
Explanation:
In population there is not much difference between New Jersey (9 million) and Georgia (10 million) but I guess in average income there is, and quite a big one too.
We also have to take into account that a state that legalizes sports betting will attract many people in the beginning (because of the novelty) and, more to the point, that probably a lot of these people making sports bets are not residents of New Jersey.
A more ethical argument would be to prove that legalizing sports bets is indeed an effective way to stop the ilegal sports betting.
Base from the advice that has been given to them, it is considered to be a good advice. It is because being able to be distracted means that the person could have more time to think about their decisions. With that, it could help them to be able to come up with the decision that they think would be best for them. That is why the advice that has given to them is a good advice.
The following is missing for the question to be complete:
A. Utilitarianism
B. Social responsibility
C. Consumerism
D. Preconventional morality
E. Distributive justice
Answer: A. Utilitarianism
Explanation: Utilitarianism is the doctrine according to which any procedure, rule, action, is good and useful if it suits the majority. According to this doctrine, the happiness and satisfaction of the majority should be the guide to which rules and norms should be harmonised. So, from the point of view of this doctrine, it is morally wrong to deprive most people of a popular student restaurant. It would be moral to meet the needs of the majority, to make the majority happy, and so the student restaurant would have usefulness, that is utility, hence the name of this doctrine. So the moral decision of what is good and what is wrong is made based on the outcome of the action or decision, and the outcome is good if it satisfies the majority.
