Answer:
<h3>Demonstration effects are effects on the behavior of individuals caused by observation of the actions of others and their consequences. The term is particularly used in political science and sociology to describe the fact that developments in one place will often act as a catalyst in another place.</h3>
Hahahaha sorry I need points
A team of seven psychologists is studying love, but each psychologist is working from a different contemporary perspective not possible.
In our opinion, it's not possible when a team working on one subject and a single study on another subject is impossible from the contemporary psychology perspective.
A behaviorist might study observable behaviors related to love, like hugging or kissing. A cognitive psychologist might study how an individual's cognitive processes change when one is crazy .
<h3>Contemporary psychological perspectives-</h3>
- Educational institutions can influence what psychological perspectives are taught, studied, and researched.
- Personal ideology also can affect which perspective a psychologist supports, the course of research a psychologist undertakes, and also a psychologist's perception and interpretation of research findings.
Thus, according to contemporary psychology perspective says it's not possible.
Learn more about the contemporary perspective here:
brainly.com/question/2002388
Answer: a. True
Explanation: Ethical Relativism is the belief that ethics are relative to an individual or a society. In essence, what is morally wrong to one person may not be to another. Each will have a reason and justification why it is right or wrong. Using this way of thinking, judgement of what is right or wrong has to be defined by the society’s rules and are not universal.
Ethical Relativism, in its weak form, makes room for objective moral principles while holding that these principles will need to be applied differently in different contexts.
Answer:
Ukraine. Gaza. Syria. Yemen. Pakistan. If it feels like the United States is always at war somewhere, that's because it is. Not just Iraq and Afghanistan - the two wars we all know about. And, granted, we're not only talking boots on the ground. It's our money, our weapons and - more often in recent weeks - our Secretary of State, engaged in high-stakes diplomacy to uneven results. At his last count, investigative journalist Kevin Gosztola put the U.S. war count at 74. These are mostly unannounced and undeclared wars against enemies that have different aspirations, strategies and ideologies.
Why? The official line varies. Some conflict engagement is, we're told, about nation-building (Iraq and Afghanistan.) Other operations are to remove a despotic ruler (Syria, Libya.) Some engagement is designed to pick off a terror group/groups (Oman, Pakistan, Yemen) and/or to spread "true" democracy (Iraq and Afghanistan, again.) There are wars we engage in to free people from a cycle of fear (Central African Republic) to stem the flow of hundreds-year-old bloodletting (Israel/Palestine) and to keep old foes in check (Ukraine/Russia).
